A problem in teaching a first language: topicalization in oral Portuguese

Eunice de Souza Lima Pontes


Abstract: My purpose in this paper isto call attention to a problem which exists in Portuguese, but whichmay existin otherlanguages aswell, since the ignorance of oral language structures, or the prejudice against colloquial registers is not a privilege of those working in my country. As a result of ignorance and prejudices, when teachers find in their students' compositions a type of sentence which is not usual in written language they tend to consider it an error. Sometimes, as it occurs today in Brazilian Portuguese, the structure may be so different from those they are familiar with that they think the student who uses it "does not master the correct thinking patterns".

I want to study, in this paper, a type of sentence which is very common in colloquial Portuguese, even among educated people, but which is not accepted in written language, and when used in compositions, it is considered an error, "bad Portuguese", "without logic", "whithout structure", etc. Teachers do not understand why their students use such structures, and they are completely at a loss when confronted with them. Students do not know either why they "err" and are equally confused. However, when we observe oral language, these structures are completely natural and when we ask educated native speakers about them, they say: "We say this".


BARRY, Roberta. Topic in Chinese: an overlap of meaning, grammar and discourse function. In: GROSSMAN, Robin E.; SAN, L. James; VANCE, Timothy J. (Ed.). Papers from Parasession on Functionalism. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1975.

BREND, Ruth. Linguistics and the Teaching of Composition. In: AILA WORLD CONGRESS, 6, 1981, Lund, Sweden. SIGURD, Bengt; SVARTVIK, Jan (Ed.) Proceedings... Lund, Wallin and Delholm Boktr, 1981.

CHAFE, Wallace. Giveness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In: LI, C.N. Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, 1976.

FIRBAS, Jan. On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of ESO. Sbornik Praci Filosofiké Fakulty Brnéské University. A, Řada jazykovědná, v. 20, n. A19, p. 135-144, 1971.

GOMES DE MATOS, F. Attitudes of Brazilian students toward regional speech varieties. In: AILA WORLD CONGRESS, 6, 1981, Lund, Sweden. SIGURD, Bengt; SVARTVIK, Jan (Ed.) Proceedings... Lund, Wallin and Delholm Boktr, 1981.

LAKOFF, George. Linguistic Gestalts. In: REGIONAL MEETING OF THE CHICAGO LINGUISTIC SOCIETY, 13, 1977, Chicago. BEACH, W. et al (Ed.). Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1977. p. 236-287.

LI, C.; THOMPSON, S. Subject and Topic: A new Typology of Language. In: LI, C. (Ed.). Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, 1976.

PONTES, Eunice S. L. Da importância do tópico em português. V ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE LINGÜÍSTICA. Rio de Janeiro: PUC/RJ, 1980. (Comunicação)

PRINCE, Ellen, Topicalization, focus-movement and Yidish Movement. A Pragmatic Differentiation. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BERKELEY LINGUISTICS SOCIETY, 7, 1981, Berkeley. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1981. p. 249-264.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/0101-3548.3.5.40-50


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Cadernos de Linguística e Teoria da Literatura
ISSN 0101-3548 (impressa)

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.