Contra a adjunção ao núcleo

Henk van Riemsdijk

Abstract


Resumo: Este texto questiona a manutenção na Teoria da Gramática de dois mecanismos que, concorrendo um com o outro, são muito parecidos em vários aspectos: a Reanálise e a Adjunção. Iniciamos a argumentação apresentando e resolvendo os problemas teóricos gerais que surgem da coexistência destes dois mecanismos na Teoria da Gramática. A seguir, com base em certos problemas para os quais os dois mecanismos apresentam análises concorrentes, argumentamos a favor de que se elimine a Adjunção da Teoria da Gramática.

Abstract: This paper challenges the maintenance in the Theory of Grammar of two competing mechanisms which are very similar in many aspects: Reanalysis and Adjunction. As a first step in the argumentation we try to present and resolve the general theoretical problema which arise from the coexistence of these two mechanisms in the Theory of Grammar. Then we argue, on the basis of certain problems for which the two mechanisms offer competing analyses, that Adjunction should be removed from the Theory of Grammar.


References


BENNIS, H.; HOEKSTRA, T. Gaps and parasitic gaps. The Linguistic Review, v. 4, p. 29-87, 1984.

BESTEN, J. B. DEN; EDMONDSON, J. The verbal complex in continental West Germanic. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik, v. 19, p. 11-61, 1981.

CHOMSKY, N. The Amherst Lectures. Documents Linguistiques, Université de Paris VII, 1974. (Inédito)

CHOMSKY, N. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.

EVERS, A. The Transformational cycle in Dutch and German. Indiana Univeraity Linguistics Club, 1975.

GOODALL, G. Parallel structures in syntax. 1984. Tese (Doutorado) - University of Califórnia, San Diego, 1984.

GREWENDORF, G. Kohäxenz und Restrukturierung. Zu verbalen Komplexen im Deutschen. In: ASBACH-SCHNITKER, B.; ROGGENHOFER, J. (Ed.). Neuere Forschungen zur Wortbildung und Historiographie der Linguistik. Tübingen: G. Narr, 1987.

HAEGEMAN, L.; VAN RIEMSDIJK, H. C. Verb projection raising, scope, and the typology of rules affecting verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, v. 17, p. 417-466, 1986.

HUYBREGTS, M. A. C. On reanalysis and convalency. In: TILBURG WORKSHOP ON REANALYSIS, maio de 1985. (Comunicação)

KOSTER, J. Domains and Dynasties: the radical autonomy of syntax. Dordrecht: Foriz, 1987.

LASNIK, H.; KUPIN, J. A restrictive theory of transformatlonal grammar. Theoretical Linguistics, v. 4, p. 173-196, 1977.

LOETSCHER, A. Zur Verbstellung im Zürichdeutschen und in anderen Varianten des Deutschen. Zeitschrlft für Dialektologie und Linguistik, v. 45, p. 1-29, 1987.

MUYSKEN, P. C. Parametrizing the Notion Head. Journal of Linguistic Research, v. 2, p. 57-76, 1983.

RIEMSDIJK, H. C. VAN. A case study in syntactic Markedness. Dordrecht: Foris, 1978.

RIEMSDIJK, H.C. VAN. NV-skeletten. In: HOPPENBROUWERS, C. et al. (Ed.). Proeven van Taalwetenschap. TABU 16, University of Groningen, 1986.

THIERSCH, C. VP and Scrambling in the German Mittelfeld. Cologne/Tilburg, 1985. (Inédito)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/0101-3548.7.13.7-31

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Cadernos de Linguística e Teoria da Literatura
ISSN 0101-3548 (impressa)

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.