Foi, é e será? Usos da fórmula da eternidade para falar do tempo na filosofia pré-socrática

Celso Vieira

Resumo


Abstract: The so called Eternity Formula is found both in Homer and Hesiod. The speeches of a seer and of the muses are said to inform the things “that are, will be and were”. Versions of this formula were also used by presocratic philosophers to describe the temporal aspect of central concepts within their cosmologies. Generally, they use it to convey the eternity of an entity by the affirmation of its existence throughout past, present and future. That is the case of fire in Heraclitus’ linear and reciprocal conception of time, of hate and love in the cyclical time of Empedocles, of the intelligence living in an eternal now in Anaxagoras’ cosmos, and of the eternal being in Melissus and Parmenides. Nonetheless, each use of the formula has its own peculiarities. The aim of this article is to make a comparative analysis of them, both within the thought of each philosopher as in face of one another. At the end I will propose a general formula of eternity in the presocratic philosophy that points towards an absolute conception of time. Furthermore, I hope to show that such an absolute treatment of time ends up by denying it implicitly or explicitly in a particular type of eternal present.

Keywords: Presocratics; eternity formula;  time; being; cosmology.


Palavras-chave


pré-socráticos; fórmula da eternidade; tempo; ser; cosmologia; Presocratics; eternity formula; time; being; cosmology.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


DIELS, H.; KRANZ, w. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlin: Weidmann, 1960/ 1961. v. 1.

CORDERO, N. Tertium non datur: Anais de filosofia clássica, Rio de Janeiro, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-17, 2007.

HESIOD. Theogony. English Translation by Hugh G. Evelyn-White. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1914.

HOMER. The Iliad. English Translation by A. T. Murray. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1924.

HOY, R. Parmenides’ complete rejection of Time. The Journal of Philosophy, New York, v. XCI, n. 11, p. 573-598, 1994.

KIRK, G.; RAVEN, J.; SCHOFIELd, M. The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

LORD, A. Perspectives on Recent work on the Oral Traditional Formula. Oral Tradition, Columbia, v. 1, n. 3, p. 467-503, 1986.

MOURELATOS, A. Pre-socratic origins of the principle that there are no origins from nothing. The Journal of Philosophy, New York, v. 78, n. 11, p. 649-665, 1981.

PARRY, M. Studies in the Epic Technique of Oral Verse-Making. I. Homer and Homeric Style. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, Cambridge Mass., 4, p. 73- 147, 1930.

VIDAL-NAQUET, P. Les temps et les dieux. Revue de l’histoire des religions, Paris, v. 157, n. 1, p. 55-80, 1960.

VIEIRA, C. Um modelo para mudança em Heráclito. CODEX 2.2, Rio de Janeiro, p. 118-136, 2010.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/1983-3636.10.2.33-54

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Direitos autorais 2014 Celso Vieira



Nuntius Antiquus
ISSN 2179-7064 (impressa) / ISSN 1983-3636 (eletrônica)

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.