Panorama da Linguística Experimental no Brasil
Abstract
Full Text:
PDF (Português (Brasil))References
BADECKER, W.; STRAUB, K. The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphora. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Washington, v. 28, p.748-769, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.28.4.748.
CHOMSKY, N. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.
CHOMSKY, N. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
CLAHSEN. H.; FELSER. C. Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, Cambridge University Press, v. 27, p. 3-42, 2006.
CLAHSEN, H.; FELSER, C.; NEUBAUER, K.; SATO, M; SILVA. R. Morphological structure in Native and Non-Native Language Processing Language Learning, Wiley Online Library, v. 60, p. 21-43, 2010.
COSTA, M. U. C. L. M. Argument Stucture in Language Acquisition: an ERP Study. 2015. 174f. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) – Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2015.
FILLMORE, C. Frame semantics. In: The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.). Linguistics in the morning calm: selected papers from SICOL-1981. Seoul, Korea: Hashin Publishing Co., 1982. p. 111-137. [Reprinted in: GEERAERTS, D. (Ed.). Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Reading. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006.]
FILLMORE, C. Valency issues in FrameNet. In: HERBST, T.; GÖTZVOTTELER, K. (Ed.). Valency: theoretical, descriptive and cognitive issues. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2007. p. 129-160.
FRAZIER, L. On comprehending sentences: syntactic parsing strategies. 1979. Tese (Doutorado) – University of Connecticut, 1979. [reproduzida por Indiana University Linguistics Club]
FRAZIER, L.; CLIFTON, C. Construal. MIT Press Cambridge, 1996.
GLUCKSBERG, S.; KEYSAR, B. Understanding metaphorical comparisons: beyond similarity. Psychological Review, American Psychological Association, v. 97, n. 1, p. 3-18, 1990. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00040-2.
HILL, A. (Ed.) Third Texas conference on problems of linguistic analysis in English. Second discussion section. Austin: University of Texas, 1962.
KROLL, J. F.; HELL, J. G. van; TOKOWICZ, N.; GREEN, D. The revised hierarchical model: a critical review and assessment. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Cambridge University Press, v. 13, n. 3, p. 373-381, July, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org./10.1017/S136672891000009X.
LANGACKER, R. W. Foundations of cognitive grammar: theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
LANGACKER, R. W. Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
LIMA, Suzi. A estrutura argumental dos verbos na língua Juruna (Yudja): da formação dos verbos para a análise das estruturas sintáticas. 2008. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2008.
MAGALHÃES, J. O.; MAIA, M. Pistas prosódicas implícitas na resolução de ambiguidades sintáticas: um caso de adjunção de atributos. Revista da ABRALIN, Florianópolis, v.5, n.1-2, p.143-167, 2006.
MAIA, M. A. R. Sintaxe experimental. In: OTHERO, Gabriel; KENEDY, Eduardo. (Org.). Sintaxe, sintaxes. São Paulo: Editora Contexto, 2015. p. 51-72.
MODESTO, M. What Brazilian Portuguese says about control: remarks on Boeckx & Hornstein. Syntax, Wiley Online Library, v. 13, n. 1, p. 78-96, 2010.
MODESTO, M. Inflected infinitives in Brazilian Portuguese and the theory of control. In: GONÇALVES, A. (Org.). Complement clauses in Portuguese: syntax and acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2016a. In press.
PHILLIPS, C.; WAGERS, M. W.; LAU, E. F. Grammatical illusions and selective fallibility. In: RUNNER, J. (Ed.). Experiments at the interface. Syntax & Semantics. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publications, 2011. v. 37, p. 153-186.
REINHART, T.; REULAND, E. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, MIT Press, v. 24, n. 4, p. 657-720, 1993.
RODRIGUES, C.; HORNSTEIN, N. Epicene agreement and inflected infinitives when the data is “Under Control”: a reply to Modesto (2010). Syntax, Wiley Online Library, v. 16, p. 292-309, 2013.
STEFANOWITSCH, A. Cognitive linguistics as a cognitive science. In: CALLIES, M.; KELLER, W. R.; LOHÖFER, A. (Ed.) Bidirectionality in the cognitive sciences. Amsterdam; Philadephia: John Benjamins, 2011. p. 296-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.32.16ste.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.25.3.951-969
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Marcus Maia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
e - ISSN 2237-2083
Licensed through Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional