O papel dos contextos e da polissemia na constituição histórica de novos juntores contrastivos / The role of contexts and polysemy in the historical development of new contrastive connectives

Luísa Ferrari

Abstract


Resumo: Este trabalho tem por objetivo investigar, em perspectiva longitudinal, o processo de constituição de construções de contraste com agora (português) e de construções de contraste com now (inglês) que expressam oposição semântica. À luz dos percursos de mudança atravessados por essas construções e de um quadro teórico que atribui à pragmática o papel de força motriz da mudança (TRAUGOTT; DASHER, 2002), busca-se reunir evidências do papel dos contextos e da polissemia no desenvolvimento de novos juntores contrastivos. Para tanto, desenvolve-se um estudo diacrônico dos contextos que fornecem condições para as mudanças de agora e de now, que atuam originalmente como advérbios temporais. Os resultados mostram, em conformidade com Traugott (2012), que, se o desenvolvimento de novos juntores envolve gramaticalização, e não apenas mudança de significado, têm papel chave contextos que aliam motivações para reinterpretação semântico-pragmática a motivações para reanálise categorial. Além disso, a análise diacrônica permite reconhecer um amplo conjunto de similaridades entre a trajetória de agora e a trajetória de now, apontando para a produtividade translinguística da fonte temporal como canal de derivação para significados contrastivos.

Palavras-chave: contextos; polissemia; contraste; gramaticalização.

Abstract: This paper aims to investigate, in a longitudinal perspective, the historical development of contrastive constructions with agora (Portuguese) and of contrastive constructions with now (English) that express semantic opposition. In the light of the paths of change undergone by these constructions and of a theoretical framework that assigns to pragmatics the role of the chief driving force in change (TRAUGOTT; DASHER, 2002), the paper searches for evidence of the role of contexts and of polysemy in the development of new contrastive connectives. For this purpose, the research develops a diachronic study of contexts that provide conditions to the changes undergone by agora and by now, which are originally temporal adverbs. The results show, in accordance with Traugott (2012), that, if the development of new connectives involves grammaticalization, and not only meaning change, contexts that ally motivations for semantic-pragmatic reinterpretation and motivations for categorial reanalysis play a key role. Moreover, the diachronic analysis shows a great amount of similarities between the path of change undergone by agora and the path undergone by now, pointing to the productivity, across languages, of the temporal source as a derivation channel for contrastive meanings.

Keywords: contexts; polysemy; contrast; grammaticalization.


Keywords


Contextos; polissemia; junção contrastiva; gramaticalização

References


BYBEE, J. Language, Usage and Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526

BYBEE, J. Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

CULICOVER, P.; JACKENDOFF, R. Semantic Subordination Despite Syntactic Coordination. Linguistic Inquiry, [S.l.], v. 28, n. 2, p. 195-217, 1997.

DIEWALD, G. A Model for Relevant Types of Contexts in Grammaticalization. In: WISCHER, I. (ed.). New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.09die

DUCROT, O. Princípios de semântica linguística. São Paulo: Cultrix; 1977.

DUCROT, O. Slovenian Lectures: Introduction into Argumentative Semantics. Ljubljana: Pedagoški inštitut, 2009. Doi: https://doi.org/10.32320/978-961-270-014-0

FERRARI, L. O papel dos contextos nas mudanças por gramaticalização e subjetivização: um estudo diacrônico das construções com ‘agora’ e ‘now’. 2018. 249 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Estudos Linguísticos) – Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José do Rio Preto, 2018.

HAIMAN, J. Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

HEINE, B. et al. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991.

HEINE, B. On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization. In: WISCHER, I. (ed.). New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2002. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.08hei

HOPPER, P.; TRAUGOTT, E. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525

KORTMANN, B. Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110812428

LAKOFF, R. If’s And’s and But’s about conjunction. In: FILLMORE, C.; LANGEDOEN, D. (ed.). Studies in Linguistique Semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971.

LANG, E. The Semantics of Coordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1984.

LANG, E. Adversative Connectors on Distinct Levels of Discourse: A Re-Examination of Eve Sweetser’s Three-Level Approach. In: COUPER-KUHLEN; E, KORTMANN, B. (ed.). Cause, Condition, Concession, Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. p. 235-256. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043.3.235

LEHMANN, C. Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage. In: HAIMAN, J.; THOMPSON, S. (ed.). Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1988. p. 181-225. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.18.09leh

LONGHIN, S. R. Emergência de juntores contrastivos na história do português: contexto, polissemia e subjetivização. Filologia e Linguística Portuguesa, São Paulo, v. 18, p. 263-299, 2016. Doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-9419.v18i2p263-299

LONGHIN, S. R.; SONCIN, G. Da subordinação à coordenação: evidências pragmáticas, prosódicas e sintáticas. Revista Internacional de Linguística Iberoamericana, [S.l.], v. 32, p. 175-199, 2018.

MAURI, C. The Parallelisms of Clausal Coordination. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique, Orleans, França, v. 24, p. 145-175, 2008a.

MAURI, C. Coordination Relations in the Languages of Europe and Beyond. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008b. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211498

MAURI, C.; RAMAT, A. G. The Development of Adversative Connectives: Stages and Factors at Play. Linguistics, Jena, Alemanha, v. 50, n. 2, p. 191-239, 2012. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0008

QUIRK, R. et al. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman, 1985.

RAMAT, A. G.; MAURI, C. The Grammaticalization of Coordinating Interclausal Connectives. In: NARROG, H.; HEINE, B. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0054

SCHWENTER, S. Pragmatics of Conditional Marking: Implicature, Scalarity, and Exclusivity. London: Routledge, 1999.

SCHWENTER, S. Viewpoints and Polysemy: Linking Adversative and Causal Meanings of Discourse Markers. In: COUPER-KUHLER, E.; KORTMANN, B. (ed.). Cause, Condition, Concession, Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043.3.257

TRAUGOTT, E. The Role of the Development of Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HISTORICAL LINGUISTICS, 12., 1995, Manchester. Disponível em: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c152/3d292a9bc97b4bcc08a9d3cadee5de02cf12.pdf?_ga=2.8587766.298324844.1565637669-1719317588.1565637669. Acesso em: 11 mar. 2016.

TRAUGOTT, E. Dialogic Contexts as Motivations for Syntactic Change. In: CLOUTIER, R.; HAMILTON-BREHM, A. M.; KRETZSCHMAR, W. (ed.) Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2010. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220339.1.11

TRAUGOTT, E. The Status of Onset Contexts in Analysis of Micro-Changes. In: KYTÖ, M. (ed.) English Corpus Linguistics: Crossing Paths. Amsterdam; New York: Editions Rodopi B., 2012. p. 221-255. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207935_012

TRAUGOTT, E.; DASHER, R. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486500




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.28.1.159-203

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
';



Copyright (c) 2019 Luísa Ferrari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

e - ISSN 2237-2083 

License

Licensed through  Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional