Email this article 
40 anos de Metaphors we live by: considerações sobre a teoria das metáforas conceituais de Lakoff e Johnson / 40 years of Metaphors we live by: remarks on Lakoff and Johnson’s theory of conceptual metaphors
Abstract
Resumo: No ensaio “Cognitive linguistics and autonomous linguistics”, publicado em 2007 no Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, John R. Taylor sugere o diálogo e mesmo a integração da linguística cognitiva com outras vertentes de estudos da linguagem. Seguindo essa linha argumentativa, reanalisa-se neste artigo a teoria das metáforas conceituais de George Lakoff e Mark Johnson. O objetivo é explicitar os excessos empíricos e retóricos cometidos por esses autores desde a publicação do livro Metaphors we live by, há 40 anos, como consequência em grande medida de seu ataque à gramática gerativa de Noam Chomsky. Com isso, espera-se facilitar a aproximação entre o gerativismo e o cognitivismo, já iniciada por pesquisadores como o próprio Taylor, Ray Jackendoff, Peter Culicover, Alan Prince e Paul Smolensky.
Palavras-chave: Linguística cognitiva; metáforas conceituais. George Lakoff; Mark Johnson; Metaphors we live by.
Abstract: In his essay Cognitive Linguistics and Autonomous Linguistics, published in the 2007 Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, John R. Taylor suggests dialogue and even integration between cognitive linguistics and other approaches in language studies. Following Taylor’s line of argument this article reviews George Lakoff and Mark Johnson’s theory of conceptual metaphor. This study intends to address both authors’ empirical and rhetorical excesses since publishing Metaphors we live by forty years ago as an outcome of their rejection of Noam Chomsky’s generative grammar. Thus, it is expected to further converge generativism and cognitivism, as already initiated by researchers such as Taylor, Ray Jackendoff, Peter Culicover, Alan Prince, and Paul Smolensky.
Keywords: Cognitive linguistics; conceptual metaphors. George Lakoff; Mark Johnson; Metaphors we live by.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Português (Brasil))References
AU, T. K. Chinese and English Counterfactuals: the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Revisited. Cognition, [S.l.], v. 15, p. 155-187, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90038-0
AU, T. K. Language and Cognition. In: SCHIEFELBUSCH, R. L.; LLOYD, L. L. (ed.). Language Perspectives: Acquisition, Retardation, and Intervention. 2. ed. Austin: Pro-Ed, 1988. p. 125-146.
BAR-HILLEL, Y. Logical Syntax and Semantics. Language, Washington, DC, v. 30, n. 2, p. 230-237, 1954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/410265
BERGEN, B. Empirical Methods in Cognitive Linguistics. In: EVANS, V.; BERGEN, B. K.; ZINKEN, J. (ed.). The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. Londres; Oakville: Equinox, 2007. p. 37-39.
BERLIN, B.; KAY, P. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkeley; Londres: University of California Press, 1969.
BORODITSKY, L. How the Languages We Speak Shape the Ways We Think: the FAQs’. In: SPIVEY, M.; MCRAE, K.; JOANISSE, M. F. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. p. 615-632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139029377.042
BRÉAL, M. Ensaio de semântica: ciência das significações. São Paulo: Educ, 1992.
BROWN, P. Language, Culture, and Spatial Cognition. In: SHARIFIAN, F. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. Abingdon; Nova York: Routledge, 2015. p. 294-308.
BROWN, P.; LEVINSON, S. C. Linguistic and Nonlinguistic Coding of Spatial Arrays: Explorations in Mayan Cognition. Nijmegen: Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, 1993a. (Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Working Paper, n. 24)
BROWN, P.; LEVINSON, S. C. “Uphill” and “Downhill” in Tzeltal. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, New York, v. 3, p. 46-74, 1993b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1993.3.1.46
BROWN, R. Linguistic Determinism and Parts of Speech. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Washington, DC, v. 55, p. 1-5, 1957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041199
BROWN, R. Words and Things. Nova York: Free Press, 1958.
BÜHLER, K. Teoria del lenguaje. Madrid: Revista de Occidente, 1950.
CARNAP, R. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. 2. ed. Chicago; Londres: The University of Chicago Press, 1988a.
CARNAP, R. Meaning and Synonymy in Natural Languages. In: ______. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. 2. ed. Chicago; Londres: The University of Chicago Press, 1988b. p. 233-247.
CARROLL, J. B. Introduction. In: WHORF, B. Lee. Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987. p. 1-34.
CHASE, S. Foreword. In: WHORF, B. L. Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987. p. v-x.
CHOMSKY, N. Logical Syntax and Semantics: Their Linguistic Relevance. Language, Washington, DC, v. 31, n. 1, p. 36-45, 1955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/410891
CHOMSKY, N. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press 1965.
CHOMSKY, N. Aspectos da teoria da sintaxe. Coimbra: Armenio Amado, 1975.
CHOMSKY, N. Diálogos com Mitsou Ronat. São Paulo: Cultrix, 1977.
CHOMSKY, N. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.
CHOMSKY, N. Language and Problems of Knowledge: the Managua Lectures. Cambridge, Mass.; Londres: MIT Press, 1988.
CHOMSKY, N. Sobre natureza e linguagem. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006.
CHOMSKY, N. Estruturas sintáticas. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2015.
CHOMSKY, N.; HALLE, M. The Sound Pattern of English. Nova York: Harper & Row, 1968.
CULICOVER, P. Syntactic Nuts: Hard Cases, Syntactic Theory, and Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
DEDRICK, D. Colour Language, Thought, and Culture. In: SHARIFIAN, F. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. Abingdon; Nova York: Routledge, 2015. p. 270-293.
DESCARTES, R. O mundo ou tratado da luz: O homem. Campinas: Editora Unicamp, 2009.
DINWOODIE, D. W. Time and the Individual in Native North America. In: KAN, S.; STRONG, P. T.; FOGELSON, R. (ed.). New Perspectives on Native North America: Cultures, Histories, and Representations. Lincoln; Londres: University of Nebraska Press, 2006. p. 327-348.
DIRVEN, R. Major strands in cognitive linguistics. In: RUIZ DE MENDOZA IBÁÑEZ, F. J.; PEÑA CERVEL, M. S. Cognitive linguistics: internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction. Berlim; Nova York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005, p. 17-68.
DIXON, R. M. W. Where Have All the Adjectives Gone? Berlim: Walter de Gruyter, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822939
ECO, U. Kant e o ornitorrinco. Rio de Janeiro; São Paulo: Record, 1998.
EVANS, V.; BERGEN, B. K.; ZINKEN, J. (ed.). The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. Londres; Oakville: Equinox, 2007a.
EVANS, V.; BERGEN, B. K.; ZINKEN, J. The Cognitive Linguistics Enterprise: An Overview. In: ______. (ed.). The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. Londres; Oakville: Equinox, 2007b. p. 2-36
FILLMORE, C. J. Innocence: A Second Idealization for Linguistics. In: BERKELEY LINGUISTICS SOCIETY, 5th., 1979, Berkeley. Berkeley: University of California, 1979. p. 63-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v5i0.3255
FREGE, G. Investigações lógicas. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2002.
FREGE, G. Prefácio da Conceitografia. In: ______. Lógica e filosofia da linguagem. 2. ed. São Paulo: Edusp, 2009. p. 43-49.
GARDNER, H. A nova ciência da mente: uma história da revolução cognitiva. 3. ed. São Paulo: Edusp, 2003.
GEERAERTS, D.; CUYCKENS, H. Introducing Cognitive Linguistics. In: ______. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Nova York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007a. p. 3-21.
GIBBS Jr., R. W. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
GIBBS Jr., R. W. Taking Metaphor Out of Our Heads and Putting It into the Cultural World. In: GIBBS Jr., R. W.; STEEN, D. (ed.). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Amsterdã; Filadélfia: John Benjamins, 1999. p. 145-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.09gib
GIBBS Jr., R. W. Why Cognitive Linguists Should Care More About Empirical Methods. In: EVANS, V.; BERGEN, B. K.; ZINKEN, J. (ed.). The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. Londres; Oakville: Equinox, 2007.
p. 2-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.18.06gib
GIVÓN, T. On Understanding Grammar. Nova York; San Francisco; Londres: Academic Press, 1979.
HARDER, P. Cognitive Linguistics and Philosophy. In: GEERAERTS, D.; CUYCKENS, H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Nova York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 1241-1265.
HARLEY, T. A. The Psychology of Language: From Data to Theory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 1995.
HARRIS, R. A. The Linguistics Wars. Nova York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
HEIDEGGER, M. Introdução à filosofia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2009.
HEIDER, E. R. “Focal” Color Areas and the Development of Color Names. Developmental Psychology, Washington, DC, v. 4, p. 447-455, 1971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030955
HEIDER, E. R. Universals in Color Naming and Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Washington, DC, v. 93, n. 1, p. 10-20, 1972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032606
HEIDER, E. R.; OLIVIER, D. C. The Structure of the Color Space in Naming and Memory for Two Languages. Cognitive Psychology, [S.l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 337-354, 1972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90011-4
HOWE, J. Argument is Argument: an Essay on Conceptual Metaphor and Verbal Dispute. Metaphor and Symbol, [S.l.], v. 23, n. 1, p. 1-23, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480701723516
HUDSON, R. Word Grammar. In: HEINE, B.; NARROG, H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. p. 857-885.
HUSSERL, E. A crise das ciências europeias e a fenomenologia transcendental: uma introdução à filosofia fenomenológica. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2012.
JACKENDOFF, R. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1980.
JACKENDOFF, R. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373167_003
JACKENDOFF, R. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford; Nova York: Oxford University Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X03000153
JACKENDOFF, R.; AARON, D. Review of More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Language, Washington, DC, v. 67, p. 320-338, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0079
JÄKEL, O. Kant, Blumenberg, Weinrich: Some Forgotten Contributions to the Cognitive Theory of Metaphor. In: GIBBS Jr., R. W.; STEEN, G. (ed.). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Amsterdã; Filadélfia: John Benjamins, 1999. p. 9-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.02jak
JOHNSON, M. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago; Londres: The University of Chicago Press, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
KANT, I. Crítica da razão pura. 2. ed. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes; Bragança Paulista: Editora Universitária São Francisco, 2013.
KATZ, J.; POSTAL, P. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1964.
KEMMERER, D. The Spatial and Temporal Meanings of English Prepositions Can Be Independently Impaired. Neuropsychologia, [S.l.], v. 43, n. 5, p. 797-806, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.06.025
KEYSAR, B.; SHEN, Y.; GLUCKSBERG, S.; HORTON, W. S. Conventional Language: How Metaphorical Is It? Journal of Memory and Language, [S.l.], v. 43, n. 4, p. 576-593, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2711
KÖVECSES, Z. Metaphor: Does It Constitute or Reflect Cultural Models? In: GIBBS Jr., R. W.; STEEN, G. (ed.). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Amsterdã; Filadélfia: John Benjamins, 1999. p. 167-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.10kov
KÖVECSES, Z. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408
KÖVECSES, Z. Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Nova York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
LAKOFF, G. Fuzzy Grammar and the Performance/Competence Terminology Game. In: CORUM, C. T.; SMITH-STARK, C./ WEISER, A. (ed.). Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Meeting Society, 1973. p. 271-291.
LAKOFF, George. Notes Toward a Theory of Global Transderivational Well-Formedness Grammar. Universidade da Califórnia, 1974. [Manuscrito inédito]
LAKOFF, George. Dual-Hierarchy Grammar. Universidade da Califórnia, 1975. [Manuscrito inédito]
LAKOFF, George. Linguistic gestalts. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, v. 13, p. 236-287, 1977.
LAKOFF, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago; Londres: The University of Chicago Press, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
LAKOFF, G. The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, Birmingham, UK, n. 1, v. 1, p. 39-74, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39
LAKOFF, G. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know that Liberals Don’t. Chicago; Londres: The University of Chicago Press, 1996.
LAKOFF, G. Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2004.
LAKOFF, G. Whose Freedom?: The Battle Over America’s Most Important Idea. Nova York: Picador, 2006.
LAKOFF, G. The Neural Theory of Metaphor. In: GIBBS Jr., R. W. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Nova York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008a. p. 17-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.003
LAKOFF, G. The Political Mind: Why You Can’t Understand 21st-Century American Politics with an 18th-Century Brain. Nova York: Viking, 2008b.
LAKOFF, G. Explaining Embodied Cognition Results. Topics in Cognitive Science, [S.l.] v. 4, p. 773-785, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.x
LAKOFF, G. Language and Emotion. Emotion Review, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 3, p. 269-273, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915595097
LAKOFF, G; JOHNSON, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
LAKOFF, G; JOHNSON, M. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Nova York: Basic Books, 1999.
LAKOFF, G; JOHNSON, M. Metáforas da vida cotidiana. São Paulo: EdUC; Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 2002.
LAKOFF, G; JOHNSON, M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago; Londres: The University of Chicago Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
LAKOFF, G.; WEHLING, E. The Little Blue Book: The Essential Guide to Thinking and Talking Democratic. Nova York: Simon and Schuster, 2012.
LANGACKER, R. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. v. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
LANGACKER, R. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. v. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991.
LEAVITT, J. Linguistic Relativities: Language Diversity and Modern Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975059
LEAVITT, J. Linguistic Relativity: Precursors and Transformations. In: SHARIFIAN, F. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. Abingdon; Nova York: Routledge, 2015. p. 18-30.
LEE, P. The Whorf Theory Complex: A Critical Reconstruction. Amsterdã: John Benjamins, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.81
LEEZENBERG, M. Contexts of Metaphor. Amsterdã; Nova York: Elsevier, 2001.
LENNEBERG, E. H. Cognition and Ethnolinguistics. Language, Washington, DC, v. 29, p. 463-471, 1953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/ 409956
LENNEBERG, E. H. Biological Foundations of Language. Nova York: Wiley & Sons, 1967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1967.11707799
LEVINSON, S. C. Frames of Reference and Molyneux’s Question: Cross-Linguistic Evidence. In: BLOOM, P.; PETERSON, M.; NADEL, L.; GARRETT, M. (ed.). Language and Space. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1996. p. 109-169.
LEVINSON, S. C. Language and Mind: Let’s Get the Issues Straight! In: GENTNER, D.; GOLDIN-MEADOW, S. (ed.). Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003a. p. 25-46.
LEVINSON, S. C. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609
LEVINSON, S. C.; WILKINS, D. (ed.). Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge; Nova York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486753
LI, P.; ABARBANELL, L.; GLEITMAN, L.; PAPAFRAGOU, A. Spatial Reasoning in Tenejapan Mayans. Cognition, [S.l.], v. 120, p. 33-53, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.012
LOCKE, J. Ensaio sobre o entendimento humano. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2012.
LUCY, J. A. Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620713
LUCY, J. A. Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620843
MALOTKI, E. Hopi Time: A Linguistic Analysis of the Temporal Concepts in the Hopi Language. Berlim; Nova York; Amsterdã. Mouton Publishers, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822816
MOUSINHO, R. Aspectos linguístico-cognitivos da síndrome de Asperger: projeção, mesclagem e mudança de enquadre. 2003. 225f. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) – Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 2003.
MOUSINHO, R. O falante inocente: linguagem pragmática e habilidades sociais no autismo de alto desempenho. Revista Psicopedagogia, São Paulo, v. 27, n. 84, p. 385-394, 2010.
MURPHY, G. L. On Metaphoric Representation. Cognition, [S.l.], v. 60, p. 173-204, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1
NERLICH, B.; CLARKE, D. D. Semantic Fields and Frames: Historical Explorations of the Interface Between Language, Action and Cognition. Journal of Pragmatics, [S.l.], v. 32, p. 125-150, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00042-9
NERLICH, B.; CLARKE, D. D. Mind, Meaning, and Metaphor: The Philosophy and Psychology of Metaphor in Nineteenth-Century Germany. History of the Human Sciences, [S.l.], v. 14, p. 39-61, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09526950122120952
NERLICH, B.; CLARKE, D. D. Cognitive Linguistics and the History of Linguistics. In: GEERAERTS, D.; CUYCKENS, H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Nova York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 589-607.
NEWMEYER, F. J. Generative Linguistics: A Historical Perspective. Londres; Nova York: Routledge, 1996.
PALMER, G. B. Toward a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1996.
PARRET, H. Discussing Language. Haia: Mouton, 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110813456
PAUL, H. Princípios fundamentais da história da língua. 2. ed. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 1983.
PEDERSON, E. Cognitive Linguistics and Linguistic Relativity. In: GEERAERTS, D.; CUYCKENS, H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Nova York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 1012-1044.
PINKER, S. O instinto da linguagem: como a mente cria a linguagem. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002.
PINKER, S. Block That Metaphor! The New Republic, New York, 9 out. 2006. Disponível em: https://newrepublic.com/article/77730/block-metaphor-steven-pinker-whose-freedom-george-lakoff. Acesso em: 28 nov. 2018.
PINKER, S. Do que é feito o pensamento: a língua como janela para a natureza humana. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2008.
POSTAL, P. The Best Theory. In: PETERS, S. (ed.). Goals of Linguistic Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1972. p. 131-170.
PRINCE, A.; SMOLENSKY, P. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, Technical Report, Piscataway, NJ, n. 2, p. 1-262, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756171.ch1
QUINE, W. O. Palavra e objeto. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes, 2010.
QUINE, W. O. Dois dogmas do empirismo. In: ______. De um ponto de vista lógico: nove ensaios lógico-filosóficos. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2011. p. 37-71.
QUINN, N. Convergent Evidence for a Cultural Model of American Marriage. In: HOLLAND, D. C.; QUINN, N. (ed.) Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge; Nova York, Cambridge University Press, 1987. p. 173-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660.008
QUINN, N. The Cultural Basis of Metaphor. In: FERNANDEZ, J. W. (ed.) Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991. p. 56-93.
QUINN, N. Culture and Contradiction: The Case of Americans Reasoning about Marriage. Ethos, [S.l.], v. 24, p. 391-425, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1996.24.3.02a00010
QUINN, N. Research on Shared Task Solutions. In: STRAUSS, C.; QUINN, N. (ed.) A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. p. 137-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167000.009
REGIER, T.; KAY, P. Language, Thought, and Color: Whorf Was Half Right. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, [S.l.] v. 13, n. 10, p. 439-446, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.07.001
REGIER, T.; KAY, P.; COOK, R. S. Focal Colors Are Universal After All. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, Washington, v. 102, n. 23, p. 8386-8391, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503281102
RITCHIE, D. ARGUMENT IS WAR – or Is It a Game of Chess? Multiple Meanings in the Analysis of Implicit Metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, [S.l.], v. 18, n. 2, p. 125-146, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1802_4
ROBERSON, D.; DAVIES, I. R.; DAVIDOFF, J. Color Categories Are Not Universal: Replications and New Evidence from a Stone-Age Culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Washington, DC, v. 129, n. 3, p. 369-398, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.3.369
ROBERSON, D.; DAVIDOFF, J.; DAVIES, I. R.; SHAPIRO, L. R. Color Categories: Evidence for the Cultural Relativity Hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, [S.l.], v. 50, n. 4, p. 378-411, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.10.001
ROHRER, T. Embodiment and Experientialism. In: GEERAERTS, D.; CUYCKENS, H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Nova York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 25-47.
RUSSELL, B. Meu pensamento filosófico. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 1960.
RUSSELL, B.; WHITEHEAD, A. N. Principia Mathematica. 2. ed. Cambridge: At The University, 1950. 3 v.
SALETAN, W. Neuto-liberalism. New York Times, Nova York, 22 jun. 2008. Disponível em: https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/books/review/Saletan-t.html. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2018.
SCHRÖDER, U. A. Os precursores filosóficos da teoria cognitiva das metáforas. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos, Campinas, v. 46, n. 2, p. 243-252, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20396/cel.v46i2.8637171
SCHRÖDER, U. A. Antecipações da metáfora cotidiana nas concepções de Hans Blumenberg e Harald Weinrich. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, Belo Horizonte, v. 16, n. 2, p. 39-54, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.16.2.39-54
SCHRÖDER, U. A. A abordagem cognitiva da metáfora em perspectiva pragmática nos séculos dezoito e dezenove: as contribuições de Lambert e Wegener a discussões atuais. Alfa, São José do Rio Preto, v. 58, n. 1, p. 115-136, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1981-57942014000100005
SCHRÖDER, U. A. Uma volta para as fundamentações filosóficas de uma teoria cognitiva da metáfora. Domínios de Lingu@gem, Uberlândia, v. 11, p. 34-62, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14393/DL28-v11n1a2017-3
SHALIZI, C. R. Analogy and Metaphor, Feb. 2003. Disponível em http://bactra.org/notebooks/analogy.html. Acesso em: 2 dez. 2017.
SINHA, C. Cognitive Linguistics, Psychology, and Cognitive Science. In: GEERAERTS, D.; CUYCKENS, H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Nova York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 1266-1294.
SLOBIN, D. I. From “Thought and Language” to “Thinking for Speaking”. In: GUMPERZ, J. J.; LEVINSON, S. C. (ed.). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. p. 70-96.
SMITH, M. V. Linguistic Relativity: on Hypotheses and Confusions. Communication & Cognition, [S.l.], v. 29, p. 65-90, 1996.
SOWA, J. F. Review of Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. Basic Books, 1999. Computational Linguistics, Cambridge, v. 25, n. 4, p. 631-634, 1999.
TALMY, L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2000. 2 v. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001
TAYLOR, J. R. Cognitive Linguistics and Autonomous Linguistics. In: GEERAERTS, Dirk; CUYCKENS, H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Nova York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 566-588.
WAISSMANN, J.; DASEN, P. R. Balinese Spatial Orientation: Some Empirical Evidence of Moderate Linguistic Relativity. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 4, p. 689-711, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3034828
WHORF, B. L. Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.29.1.153-214
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Gustavo Augusto Fonseca Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
e - ISSN 2237-2083
Licensed through Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional