Lingüística textual: para novas margens?

Robert de Beaugrande

Abstract


In retrospect, perhaps the deepest issue in the evolution of textlinguistics was whether the concept of the ‘text’ would be adaptedand restricted to fit the conventional linguistics of the sentence, orwhether it would lead to a novel conception of linguistics itself.The second alternative has evidently won out through theestablishment of the text as a communicative event rather thanmerely a linguistic unit. A fundamental shift of perspective hasensued from formalism toward functionalism, raising the prospectof redesignating the field as a ‘text science’ that restores languageand text to the broader contexts of communication both withinscience and about science.

References


BEAUGRANDE, Robert de. Factors in a theory of poetic translating. Assen: van Gorcum, and Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1978.

BEAUGRANDE, Robert de. Linguistic theory. The discourse of fundamental works. London: Longman, 1991.

BEAUGRANDE, Robert de. Function and form in language theory and research. The Tide is Turning. In: Functions of Language , v. 1/2, p. 163-200, 1994.

BEAUGRANDE, Robert de. New foundations for a science of text and discourse. Norwood: Ablex, 1996a. A publicar. [O texto em questão foi publicado em 1992 pela Ablex Publishing Company.]

BEAUGRANDE, Robert de. The ‘Pragmatics’ of doing Language Science. The ‘Warrant’ for large-corpus linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics, v. 25, p. 503-535, 1996b.

BEAUGRANDE, Robert de. Theory and Practice in Applied Linguistics. Disconnection, conflict, or dialectic? Applied Linguistics. No prelo a.

BEAUGRANDE, Robert de. On History and Historicity in Modern Linguistics. Formalism versus Functionalism revisited. Functions of Language. No prelo b.

BEAUGRANDE, Robert de; DRESSLER, Wolfgang. Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1981.

BLOOMFIELD, Leonard. Language. New York: Holt, 1933.

BOLINGER, Dwight. Getting the Words in. American Speech, v. 45, p. 78-84, 1970.

CARTER, Ronald (Ed.). Knowledge about language and the curriculum. The Linc Reader. London: Hoffer and Sloughton, 1990.

CATFORD, John Cunnison. A linguistic theory of translation. Oxford: University Press, 1965.

CHOMSKY, Noam. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton, 1957.

CHOMSKY, Noam. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965.

HARTMANN, Peter. Theorie der Grammatik. The Hague: Mouton, 1963a.

HARTMANN, Peter. Theorie der Sprachwissenschaft. Assen: van Gorcum, 1963b.

HARTMANN, Peter. Syntax und Bedeutung. Assen: van Gorcum, 1964.

HARWEG Roland. Pronomina und Textkonstitution. München: Fink, 1968.

HEGER, Klaus. Monem, Wort und Satz. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1971.

HEGER, Klaus. Monem, Wort, Satz und Text. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1976.

HEINEMANN, Wolfgang, VIEHWEGER, Dieter. Textlinguistik. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1991.

KOCH, Walter. Taxologie des Englischen. München: Fink, 1971.

PETÖFI, János S. (Hrsg.). Text vs. sentence. Basic questions of text linguistics. Hamburg: Buske, 1979.

SCHEGLOFF, Emmanuel. To Searle on conversation. A note in return. In: PARRET, Herrmann, VIEHWEGER, Jef. (Ed.). On Searle on conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1992. P. 113-128.

SCHMIDT, Siegfried J. Bedeutung und Begriff. Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1968.

WIENOLD, Götz. Formulierungstheorie. Franffurt/M.: Athenäum, 1972.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.10.1.43-60

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
';

Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c)



e - ISSN 2237-2083 

License

Licensed through  Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional