Construções Modais com dar no português do Brasil: metáfora, uso e gramática

Maria Margarida Martins Salomão

doi:10.17851/2237-2083.16.1.83-115

Construções Modais com dar no português do Brasil: metáfora, uso e gramática

Maria Margarida Martins Salomão

Abstract

Neste artigo propõe-se uma análise da família de construções modais com o verbo “dar” no português brasileiro, baseada no modelo construcionista goldbergiana. Os resultados obtidos apontam para o tratamento da gramática como rede de construções baseada no uso e motivada por esquemas cognitivamente basilares.

Keywords

Modalidade; Gramática de Construções; Metáfora.

Full Text:

PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

ARAGÃO NETO, M. Análise de dirigir a partir de uma proposta de interface entre HPSG e o léxico gerativo. Working Papers em Lingüística, 2007.

BARCELONA, Antonio. On the plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In: BARCELONA, A. (Org.). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000.

BARLOW, Michael. Usages, blends and grammar. In: BARLOW, Michael; KEMMER, Susan (Org.). Usage based models of language. Stanford: CLSI, 2000.

BERGEN, Benjamin. Experimental methods in simulation semantics. In: GONZALEZ-MARQUES, Monica; MITTELBERG, Irene; COULSON, Seana; SPIVEY, Michael (Org.). Methods in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2006.

BERGEN, Benjamin; CHANG, Nancy. Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In: ÖSTMAN, Jan-Ola; FRIED, Mirjam (Org.). Construction grammars; cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Jonh Benjamins, 2005.

BLOOM, Paul. How children learn the meaning of words. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000.

BUCCINO, G. et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. European Journal of Neurosciences, v. 13, n. 2, p. 400-404, 2001.

BYBEE, Joan; PAGLIUCCA, William. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In: FISIAK, J. (Org.). Historical semantics: Historical word-formation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1985.

BYBEE, Joan; PERKINS, Revere; PAGLIUCCA, William. The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1994.

CAMERON-FAULKNER, Thea; KIDD, Evan. I’m are what I’m are: the acquisition of first-person singular present BE. Cognitive Linguistics, v. 18, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2007.

CHANG, Nancy. Constructing grammar: a computational model of the acquisition of early constructions. 2005. Thesis (Ph.D.) - University of California, Berkeley, 2005.

CULLICOVER, Peter; JACKENDOFF, Ray. Simpler syntax. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

DIEWALD, Gabriele. Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. Constructions SV1-9/2006. Disponível em: www.constructions-online.de:0009-4-6860. ISSN 1860-2010.

DODGE, Ellen; WRIGHT, Abby. Herds of wildebeest, flasks of vodka, heaps of trouble: an embodied construction grammar approach to English measure phrases. ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BERKELEY LINGUISTICS SOCIETY, 28th. 2002. Berkeley. Proceedings… Berkeley: University of California, 2002.

FELDMAN, Jerome. From molecule to metaphor; a neural theory of language. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2006.

FILLMORE, Charles J. Frame semantics and the nature of language. In: HARNAD, S.R. et al. (Org.). Origins and evolution of language and speech. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1976.

FILLMORE, Charles J. Topics in lexical semantics. In: COLE, R.W. (Org.). Current issues in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1977.

FILLMORE, Charles J. Frame semantics. In: The Linguistic Society of Korea (Org.). Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin, 1982.

FILLMORE, Charles J. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, v. 6, p. 222-254, 1985.

FILLMORE, Charles J. The mechanisms of construction grammar. ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BERKELEY LINGUISTICS SOCIETY, 14th. 1988, Berkeley. Proceedings… Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 1988.

FILLMORE, Charles J.; KAY, Paul. Construction grammar. Ms. University of California, Berkeley, 1993.

FILLMORE, Charles; KAY, Paul; O’CONNOR, Mary Catherine. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of ‘let alone’. Language, v. 64, p. 501-38, 1988.

GALLESE, Vittorio; LAKOFF, George. The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensory motor systems in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, v. 1, 2005.

GOLDBERG, Adele. Constructions at work. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

GOLDBERG, Adele. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995.

GOLDBERG, Adele; JACKENDOFF, Ray. The resultative as a family of constructions. Language, v. 80, p. 532-568, 2004.

GRIES, Stephan Th. Corpus-based methods and cognitive linguistics: the many senses of to run. In: GRIES, Stephan Th.; STEFANOWITSCH, Anatol (Org.). Corpora in cognitive linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006.

HEINE, Bernd; CLAUDI, Ulrike; HUNNEMEYER, Friederike. Grammaticalization: a conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

HEINE, B. Agent-Oriented vs. Epistemic modality: some observations on German modals. In: BYBEE, Joan; FLEISCHMAN, Susan (Ed.). Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1993.

HOPPER, Paul. Emergent grammar and the a priori grammar postulate. In: TANNEN, Deborah (Org.). Linguistics in context. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1988.

HOPPER, Paul. Emergent grammar. In: TOMASELLO, Michael (Org.). The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998.

HOPPER, Paul; TRAUGOTT, Elizabeth [1993]. Grammaticalization.2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

JACKENDOFF, Ray. Foundations of language. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.

LAKOFF, George; JOHNSON, Mark. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980.

LAKOFF, George. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: ORTHONY, Andrew (Org.). Metaphor and thought. 2nd edition substantially revised. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

LAKOFF, George. Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

LAKOFF, George; JOHNSON, Mark. Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books, 1999.

LAKOFF, George. The neural theory of metaphor. Unpublished MS (unpaged). 2006. Disponível em: http://hci.ucsd.edu/coulson/cogling/lakoff10.pdf.

LAKOFF, George. The neuroscience of form in art. In: TURNER, M. (Ed.). The artful mind. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

LAKOFF, George. Ten lectures on cognitive linguistics. Beijing Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2007.

LANGACKER, Ronald. A usage-based model. In: RUDZKA-OSTYN, B. (Org.). Topics in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1988.

NARAYANAN, Srini. KARMA: Knowledge based active representation for metaphor and aspect. 1997. Dissertation (Ph.D) - Computer Science Division. University of California, Berkeley, 1997.

NEWMAN, John. Give: a cognitive study. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1996.

POLLARD, Carl; SAG, Ivan. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Stanford: CLSI e Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

SAG, Ivan; WASOW, Thomas; BENDER, Emily. Syntactic theory: a formal introduction. Stanford: CLSI. @and edition, 2003.

SALOMÃO, Maria-Margarida. Polysemy, aspect and modality: the case for a cognitive explanation of grammar. 1990. Dissertation (Ph.D) - Department of Linguistics. University of California, Berkeley, 1990.

SALOMÃO, Maria-Margarida. Tudo certo como dois e dois são cinco: todas as construções de uma língua. A ser publicado em 2008, pela Editora da UFMG.

SWEETSER, Eve. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In: AXMAKER, S. et al. (Ed.). BLS-14.Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 1988.

SWEETSER, Eve. From etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

TALMY, Leonard. Force dynamics. Conferência apresentada ao Congresso sobre Language and Mental Imagery, em maio de 1981. Berkeley: University of California, 1981.

TALMY, Leonard. Force dynamics in language and thought. REGIONAL MEETING OF THE CHICAGO LINGUISTIC SOCIETY, 21st. 1985. Chicago. Papers… Chicago: University of Chicago, 1985.

TALMY, Leonard. Force Dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Sciences, v. 12, p. 49-100, 1988.

TALMY, Leonard. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 2000. 2 v.

TOMASELLO, Michael. First verbs: a case study of early grammatical development. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

TOMASELLO, Michael. Constructing a language: a usage based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press, 2003.

TRAUGOTT, Elizabeth. Historical aspects of modality. In: FRAWLEY, William. (Ed.). The expression of modality. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006.

TRAUGOTT, Elizabeth; DASHER, Richard. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

van der AUWERA, Johan; PLUNGIAN, Vladimir. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, v. 2, 1998.

VELLOSO, Monica. A emergência da gramática: estudo da idiomatização da Construção Modal com “dar” no Português do Brasil. M. A. Thesis in progress. Juiz de Fora, Brasil: UFJF, 2007.

VENDLER, Zeno. Linguistics and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1967.

WISCHER, Ilse; DIEWALD, Gabriele (Org.). New reflections on grammaticalization. International Symposium, Potsdam 1999. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2002.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.16.1.83-115