Email this article 
O movimento ocular na leitura realizada por revisores de textos / Revisers’ eye movement in reading
Abstract
Resumo: Este estudo objetivou investigar o processamento da leitura de profissionais revisores de textos, comparando o movimento ocular destes com o de sujeitos que não trabalham profissionalmente com revisão (não revisores). Na tarefa de leitura e detecção de erros realizada por 14 revisores e 14 não revisores, os participantes deveriam ler e revisar pequenos textos jornalísticos projetados no computador, clicando com o mouse nos erros e/ou inadequações que encontrassem. Havia dois tipos de erros nos estímulos experimentais: a) supressão de preposição e b) incoerência gerada por uma anáfora nominal incorreta. Na análise estatística, quando garantida a normalidade, foram realizados modelos mistos; do contrário, a análise foi realizada por meio de testes não paramétricos. Quanto à análise do movimento ocular, a perspectiva geral foi de que os revisores apresentaram valores mais elevados, o que significa que eles foram mais lentos na leitura do que os não revisores, o que foi identificado nas medidas do nível do texto, da sentença e do trecho alvo. Esta pesquisa contribui para uma caracterização dos processos de leitura envolvidos em tarefas de revisão de textos por revisores profissionais.
Palavras-chave: revisão de textos; revisão profissional; movimento ocular; proficiência.
Abstract: This study aims to investigate the reading processing of professional revisers comparing their eye movement with subjects who do not work professionally in revising (non revisers). In the reading and error detection task proposed and performed by 14 revisers and 14 non revisers, the participants had to read and edit short journalistic texts displayed on a computer, by clicking on the errors and/or inadequacies they found using the mouse. There were two types of errors: a) suppression of preposition and b) incoherence generated by an incorrect nominal anaphora. In the statistic analysis, when normality was ensured, mixed models were carried out; otherwise, the analysis was carried out by means of non-parametric tests. Considering the eye movement analysis, the general perspective indicate that revisers presented the highest values, meaning they were slower in reading than non revisers, which occurred concerning the measures of the text, sentence and local levels. This research contributes to a characterization of reading processes involved in revisions of texts by professional reviewers.
Keywords: revision; professional revisers; eye movement; proficiency.
Keywords
References
ALAMARGOT, D. et al. Eye and Pen: a new device to study reading during writing. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, Bethesda, USA, v. 38, n. 2, p. 287-299, 2006. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192780.
HAYES J. R. A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In: C. Levy; S. Ransdell (Ed.). The science of writing: theories, methods, individual differences and applications. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996. p. 1-28.
HAYES, J. R. What triggers revision? In: ALLAL, L.; CHANQUOY, L.; LARGY, P. (Ed.). Revision: cognitive and instructional processes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Masssachusetts, 2004, p. 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_2.
HAYES J. R. et al. Cognitive processes in revision. In: ROSENBERG, S. (Ed.). Advances in psycholinguistics: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. v. II: Reading, writing, and language processing, p. 176-240.
HAYES, J. R.; FLOWER, L. S. Identifying the organization of writing processes. In: GREGG, L. W.; STEINBERG, E. R. (Ed.). Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 1980. p. 3-30.
HEURLEY, L. La révision de texte: L’approche de la Psychologie Cognitive. Langages, Larousse, v. 164, n. 4, p. 10-25, 2006. https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.164.0010.
HYONA, Jukka; KAAKINEN, Johanna K.; LORCH, Robert F. Jr. Individual Differences in Reading to Summarize Expository Text: Evidence From Eye Fixation Patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, Taylor & Francis, v. 94, n. 1, p. 44-55, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.44.
HYONA, Jukka; NIEMI, Pekka. Eye Movements During Repeated Reading of a Text. Acta Psychologica, Elsevier, v. 73, p. 259-280, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(90)90026-C.
HYONA, Jukka; NURMINEN, Anna-Mari. Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports. British Journal of Psychology, John Wiley & Sons, v. 97, p. 31-50, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712605X53678.
KLEIN, G. A.; HOFFMAN, R. R. Seeing the invisible: perceptual-cognitive aspects of expertise. In: RABINOWITZ, M. (Ed.). Cognitive Science Foundations of Instruction. Mahwah, N. J: Eribaum, 1992.
p. 203-226.
LAND, Michael F. Fixation Strategies during active behavior: a brief history. In: VAN GOMPEL, R. P. G. et al. (Ed.). Eye Movements: a window on mind and brain. Amsterdã: Elsevier, 2007. p. 76-95.
LEITE, Délia Ribeiro. O olhar do profissional: estudo do movimento ocular na leitura realizada por revisores de textos. 2014. Tese (Doutorado) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2014.
LUEGI, Paula. O registro do movimento dos olhos durante a leitura de textos. Dissertação de mestrado. Universidade de Lisboa, 2006.
RAYNER, Keith. Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research. Psychological Bulletin, Washington, v. 124, n. 3, p. 372-422, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372.
STAUB, Adrian; RAYNER, Keith. Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes. In: GASKELL, G. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 327-342.
VAURAS, Marja; HYONA, Jukka; NIEMI, Pekka. Comprehending coherent and incoherent texts: evidence from eye movement patterns and recall performance. Journal of Research in Reading, Wiley online Library, v. 15, n. 1, p. 39-54, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1992.tb00020.x.
WAGNER, Luiz Roberto; CUNHA, Djenane S. W. Categorias de um revisor. Língua Portuguesa – conhecimento prático, 2012. n. 37, p. 12-13.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.25.3.1801-1830
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA DE ESTUDOS DA LINGUAGEM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
e - ISSN 2237-2083
Licensed through Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional