A segmentação da fala espontânea: aspectos prosódicos, funcionais e aplicações para a tecnologia / Spontaneous Speech Segmentation: Functional and Prosodic Aspects with Applications for Automatic Segmentation

Plínio A. Barbosa; Tommaso Raso

doi:10.17851/2237-2083.26.4.1397-1433

A segmentação da fala espontânea: aspectos prosódicos, funcionais e aplicações para a tecnologia / Spontaneous Speech Segmentation: Functional and Prosodic Aspects with Applications for Automatic Segmentation

Plínio A. Barbosa, Tommaso Raso

Abstract

Full Text:

PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

AMIR, N.; SILBER-VAROD, V.; IZRE’EL, S. Characteristics of Intonation Unit Boundaries in Spontaneous Spoken Hebrew: Perception and Acoustic Correlates. In: SPEECH PROSODY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2004. Nara. Proceedings… Nara: ISCA, 2004. p. 677-680.

AURAN, C.; BOUZON, C.; HIRST, D. The Aix-MARSEC Project: an Evolutive Database of Spoken British English. In: SPEECH PROSODY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2004. Nara, Japan. Proceedings… Nara: ISCA, 2004.

AVANZI, M.; LACHERET-DUJOUR, A.; VICTORRI, B. ANALOR. Tool for Semi-Automatic Annotation of French Prosodic Structure. In: ANALOR. A Tool for Semi-Automatic Annotation of French Prosodic Structure. Campinas, Brazil, May 2008. p. 119-122.

BARBOSA, P. A. Caractérisation et génération automatique de la structuration rythmique du français. 1994. Tese (Doutorado) – Institut National Polytecnique de Grenoble, França, 1994.

BARBOSA, P. A. Incursões em torno do ritmo da fala. Campinas: Pontes, 2006.

BARBOSA, P. A. Prominence-and Boundary-Related Acoustic Correlations in Brazilian Portuguese Read and Spontaneous Speech. In: SPEECH PROSODY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 4., 2008, Campinas. Proceedings… Campinas: ISCA, 2008. p. 257-260.

BARBOSA, P. A. Automatic Duration-Related Salience Detection in Brazilian Portuguese Read and Spontaneous Speech. In: SPEECH PROSODY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 5., 2010, Chicago. Proceedings… Chicago: ISCA, 2010.

BARBOSA, P. A. Panorama of Experimental Prosody Research. In: GSCP INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE – SPEECH AND CORPORA, VIIth., Belo Horizonte. Proceedings… Florence: Firenze University Press, 2012. p. 33-42.

BARTH-WEINGARTEN, D. Intonation Units Revisited. Cesura in Talk-In-Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2016.

BIBER, D.; JOHANSSON, S.; LEECH, G.; CONRAD, S.; FINEGAN, E. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 1999.

BLANCHE-BENVENISTE, C. Macro-syntaxe et micro-syntaxe: les dispositifs de la rection verbale. In: ANDERSEN, H. L.; NØLKE, H. (Éd.). Macro-Syntaxe e Macro-Sémantique. Bern: Peter Lang, 2002. p. 95-115.

BLANCHE-BENVENISTE, C. Le recouvrement de la syntaxe et de la macro-syntaxe. In: SCARANO, A. (Ed.). Macro-syntaxe et pragmatique. L’analyse linguistique de l’oral. Roma: Bulzoni, 2003. p. 53-75.

BLANCHE-BENVENISTE, C.; JEANJEAN, C. Le français parlé. Transcription et édition. Paris: Didier Érudition; Institut National de la Langue Française, 1987.

BLANCHE-BENVENISTE C. Macro-syntaxe et micro-syntaxe: les dispositifs de la rectionverbale. In: ANDERSEN, H. L.; NØLKE, H. (Éd.). Macro-syntaxe et macro-sémantique. Actes du Colloque International d’Århus [17-19 mai 2001]. Bern: Peter Lang, 2002. p. 95-118.

BÖGELS, S.; SCHRIEFERS, H.; VONK, W.; CHWILLA, D. J.; KERKHOFS, R. The Interplay Between Prosody and Syntax in Sentence Processing: The Case of Subject- and Object-Control Verbs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Cambridge, v. 22, n. 5, p. 1036-1053, 2010.

BÖGELS, S.; SCHRIEFERS, H.; VONK, W.; CHWILLA, D.; KERKHOFS, R. Processing Consequences of Superfluous and Missing Prosodic Breaks in Auditory Sentence Comprehension. Neuropsychologia, Oxford, v. 51, p. 2715-2728, 2013.

BÖGELS, S.; TORREIRA, F. Listeners Use Intonational Phrase Boundaries to Project Turn Ends in Spoken Interaction. Journal of Phonetics, [s.l.], v. 52, p. 46-57, 2015.

BOLINGER, D. Pitch Accent and Sentence Rhythm. In: ABE, I.; KANEKIYO, T. (Ed.). Forms of English: Accent, Morpheme, Order. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1965. p. 139-180.

BOSSAGLIA, G.; MELLO, H.; RASO, T. Insubordination and the Syntax/Prosody Interface in Spoken Brazilian Portuguese: Data on Adverbial Clauses. In: IZRE’EL, S.; MELLO, H.; PANUNZI, A.; RASO, T. In Search for a Reference Unit of Spoken Language: A Corpus Driven Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Forthcoming).

BUHMANN, J.; CASPERS, J.; HEUVEN, V. J. van; HOEKSTRA, H.; MARTENS, J-P.; SWERTS, M. Annotation of Prominent Words, Prosodic Boundaries and Segmental Lengthening by Non-Expert Transcribers in the Spoken Dutch Corpus. In: LREC, 3rd, 2002, Las Palmas. Proceedings… Las Palmas: ELRA, 2002. p. 779-785.

BYBEE, J. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP, 2010.

CARLSON, R.; HIRSCHBERG, J.; SWERTS, M. Cues to Upcoming Swedish Prosodic Boundaries: Subjective Judgment Studies and Acoustic Correlates. Speech Communication, [s.l.], v. 46, p. 326-333, 2005. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.013

CAVALCANTE, F. The Topic Unit in Spontaneous American English: a Corpus-Based Study. 2016. Master (Thesis) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2016.

CHAFE, W. Discourse, Consciousness and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1994.

COUPER-KUHLEN, E. Prosody and sequence organization in English conversation. In: COUPER-KUHLEN, E.; FORD, C. E. (Ed.). Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-Linguistic Studies from Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004. p. 335-376.

COWAN, N. Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195119107.001.0001

CRESTI, E. Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca, 2000. 2 v.

CRESTI, E. Notes on Lexical Strategy, Structural Strategies and Surface Clause Indexes in the C-ORAL-ROM Spoken Corpora. In: CRESTI, E.; MONEGLIA, M. (Ed.). C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2005. p. 209-256.

CRESTI, E. Syntactic Properties of Spontaneous Speech in the Language into Act Theory: Data on Italian Complements and Relative Clauses. In: RASO, T.; MELLO, H. (Ed.). Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014.

CRESTI, E. The Pragmatic Analysis of Speech and Its Illocutionary Classification According to Language into Act Theory. In: IZRE’EL, S.; MELLO, H.; PANUNZI, A.; RASO, T. In Search for a Reference Unit of Spoken Language: A Corpus Driven Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Forthcoming).

CRESTI, E.; MONEGLIA, M. (Ed.). C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005.

CROFT, W. Intonational Units and Grammatical Structure. Linguistics, [s.l.], v. 33, n. 5, p. 839-882, 1995.

CRUTTENDEN, Alan. Intonation. 2nd edition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

CRYSTAL, D. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP, 1969.

DILLEY, L.; SHATTUCK-HUFNAGEL, S.; OSTENDORF, M. Glottalization of Word-Initial Vowel as a Function of Prosodic Structure. Journal of Phonetics, [s.l.], v. 24, p. 423- 444, 1996.

DRURY, J. E.; BAUM, Sh. R; VALERIOTE, H.; STEINHAUSER, K. Punctuation and Implicit Prosody in Silent Reading: An ERP Study Investigating English Garden-Path Sentences. Frontiers in Psychology, [s.l.], Sept. 2016. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01375

DU BOIS, J. W.; CHAFE, W. L.; MEYER, Ch.; THOMPSON, S. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English. Washington DC: Linguistic Data Consortium, 2000-2005.

DU BOIS, J. W.; CUMMING, S.; SCHUETZE-COBURN, S.; PAOLINO, D. Discourse transcription. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, Santa Barbara, v. 4, n. 1, p. 225, 1992.

EVANS, N.; WATANABE, H. The dynamics of insubordination: An overview. In: ______. (Ed.). Insubordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2016.

FERY, C. Intonation and Prosodic Structure. Cambridge: CUP, 2017.

FIRENZUOLI, V.; SIGNORINI, S. L’unità informativa di topic: correlati intonativi. In: MAROTTA, G. (Ed.). La coarticolazione: attidelle XIII Giornate di Studio del Gruppo di Fonetica Sperimentale, [28-30 nov. 2002]. Pisa: ETS, 2003. p. 177-184.

FON, J.; JOHNSON, K.; CHEN, S. Durational Patterning at Syntactic and Discourse Boundaries in Mandarin Spontaneous Speech. Language and Speech, [s.l.], v. 54, n. 1, p. 5-32, 2011.

FUCHS, S.; KRIVOKAPIĆ, J.; JANNEDY, S. Prosodic Boundaries in German: Final Lengthening in Spontaneous Speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, [s.l.], v. 127, n. 3, p. 1851, 2010. Doi: 10.1121/1.3384378

FURHT, B.; VILLANUSTRE, F. Big Data Technologies and Applications. [s.l.]: Springer, 2016.

GAROFOLO, J. S.; LAMEL, L. F.; FISHER, W. M.; FISCUS, J. G.; PALLETT, D. S.; DAHLGREN, N. L.; ZUE, V. TIMIT Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus LDC93S1. Web Download. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, 1993.

GEE, J. P.; GROSJEAN, F. Performance Structures: A Psycholinguistic and Linguistic Appraisal. Cognitive Psychology, [s.l.], v. 15, n. 4, p. 411-458, 1983.

GLUSHKO, A.; STEINHAUER, K.; De PRIEST, J.; KOELSCH, S. Neurophysiological Correlates of Musical and Prosodic Phrasing: Shared Processing Mechanisms and Effects of Musical Expertise. PLoS ONE, San Francisco, v. 11, n. 5, 2016.

GORDON, M.; LADEFOGED, P. Phonation Types: a Cross-Linguistic Overview. Journal of Phonetics, [s.l.], v. 29, p. 383-406, 2001.

GROSJEAN, F.; DOMMERGUES, J. Y. Les structures de performance en psycholinguistique. L’Année Psychologique, [s.l.], v. 83, n. 2, p. 513-536, 1983.

GROSJEAN, F.; GROSJEAN, L.; LANE, H. The Patterns of Silence: Performance Structures in Sentence Production. Cognitive Psychology, [s.l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 58-81, 1979.

HANSON, H. M.; CHUANG, E. S. Glottal Characteristics of Male Speakers: Acoustic Correlates and Comparison with Female Data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, [s.l.], v. 106, n. 2, p. 1064-1077, 2001.

t’HART, J. Differential Sensitivity to Pitch Distance, Particularly in Speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, [s.l.], v. 69, n. 3, p. 811-821, 1981.

t’HART, J.; COLLIER, R.; COHEN, A. A Perceptual Study on Intonation: An Experimental Approach to Speech Melody. Cambridge: CUP, 1990. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627743

HICKOK, G.; POEPPEL, D. Towards a Functional Neuroanatomy of Speech Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, [s.l.], v. 4, n. 4, p. 131-138, 2000.

HIRST, D.; Di CRISTO, A. A Survey of Intonation Systems. In: ______. (Ed.). Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

HUGGINS, A. W. F. Just Noticeable Differences for Segment Duration in Natural Speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, [s.l.], v. 51, n. 4B, p. 1270-1278, 1972.

HWANG, H.; STEINHAUER, K. Phrase Length Matters: The Interplay Between Implicit Prosody and Syntax in Korean ‘Garden Path’ Sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Cambridge, v. 23, n. 11, p. 3555-3575, 2011. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00001

HYAMS, N.; ORFITELLI, R. The Acquisition of Syntax. In: CAIRNS, H.; FERNANDEZ, E. (Ed.). Handbook of Psycholinguistics. [s.l.]: Wiley; Blackwell Publishers, 2015.

IZRE’EL, S. The Corpus of Spoken Israeli Hebrew: Textual Samples. Lesson Enu, v. 64, p. 289-314, 2002.

IZRE’EL, S.; MELLO, H.; PANUNZI, A.; RASO, T. (Ed.). In Search for a Reference Unit of Spoken Language: A Corpus Driven Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Forthcoming)

KLATT, D. H.; COOPER, W. E. Perception of Segment Duration in Sentence Contexts. In: COHEN, A.; NOOTEBOOM, S. G. (Ed.). Structure and Process in Speech Perception. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer, 1975. p. 69-89. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81000-8_5

KOFFI, E. A Just Noticeable Difference (JND) Reanalysis of Fry’s Original Acoustic Correlates of Stress in American English. Linguistic Portfolios, St. Cloud, v. 7, 2018.

LADD, D. R. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

LIEBERMAN, P. Some Acoustic Correlates of Word Stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, [s.l.], v. 32, p. 451-454, 1960.

LINELL, P. The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origins and Transformations. London; New York: Routledge, 2005. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203342763

MacNEILAGE, P. F. The Frame/Content Theory of Evolution of Speech Production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Cambridge, v. 21, n. 4, p. 499-511, 1998.

MARTIN, P. Les problèmes de l’intonation: recherches et applications. Langue Française, [s.l.], v. 19, p. 4-32, 1973.

MARTIN, P. Prosodic and Rhythmic Structures in French. Linguistics, [s.l.], v. 25, n. 5, p. 925-950, 1987.

MELLO, H.; RASO, T.; MITTMANN, M. VALE, H.; CÔRTES, P. Transcrição e segmentação prosódica do corpus c-oral-brasil: critérios de implementação e validação. In: RASO, T.; MELLO, H. (Ed.). C-ORAL-BRASIL I. Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2012. p. 125-174.

METTOUCHI, A.; CAUBET, D.; VANHOVE, M.; TOSCO, M.; COMRIE, B.; IZRE’EL, S. CORPAFROAS, A Corpus for Spoken Afroasiatic Languages: Morphosyntactic and Prosodic Analysis. In: ITALIAN MEETING OF AFRO-ASIATIC LINGUISTICS, 13th, 2010, Padova. Proceedings… Padova: Sargon, 2010. p.177-180.

MITTMANN, M. M. O C-ORAL-BRASIL e o estudo da fala informal: um novo olhar sobre o Tópico no Português Brasileiro. 2012. Dissertation (Ph.D.) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2012.

MITTMANN, M. M.; BARBOSA, P. A. An Automatic Speech Segmentation Tool Based on Multiple Acoustic Parameters. CHIMERA. Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies, Madrid, v. 3, p.133-147, 2016.

MO, Y. Duration and Intensity as Perceptual Cues for Naïve Listeners’ Prominence and Boundary Perception. In: SPEECH PROSODY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 4th., 2008, Campinas. Proceedings… Campinas: ISCA, 2008. p. 739-742.

MO, Y.; COLE, J.; LEE, E. K. Naïve Listeners’ Prominence and Boundary Perception. In: SPEECH PROSODY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 4th., 2008, Campinas. Proceedings… Campinas: ISCA, 2008. p. 735-738.

MO, Y.; COLE, J. Perception of Prosodic Boundaries in Spontaneous Speech with and Without Silent Pauses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America [s.l.], v. 127, n. 3, p. 1956, 2010.

MONEGLIA, M.; CRESTI, E. L’intonazione e i criteri di transcrizione del parlato adulto e infantile. In: BORTOLINI, U.; PIZZUTO, E. (Ed.). Il Progetto CHILDES Italia. Pisa: Del Cerro, 1997. p. 57-90.

MONEGLIA, M.; FABBRI, M.; QUAZZA, S.; ANDREA; PANIZZA, A.; DANIELI, M; GARRIDO, J. M.; SWERTS, M. Evaluation of Consensus on the Annotation of Terminal and Non-Terminal Prosodic Breaks in the C-ORAL-ROM corpus. In: CRESTI, E.; MONEGLIA, M. (Ed.). C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005. p. 257-276. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.15.09mon

MONEGLIA, M.; RASO, T. Notes Language into Act Theory (L-AcT). In: RASO, T.; MELLO, H. (Ed.). Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014. p. 468-495. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.61.15mon

MONNIN, P.; GROSJEAN, F. Les structures de performance en français: caractérisation et prédiction. L’Année Psychologique, [s.l.], v. 93, p. 9-30, 1993.

MORAES, J. A.; RILLIARD, A. Illocution, Attitude and Prosody: A Multimodal Analysis. In: RASO, T.; MELLO, H. (Ed.). Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014. p. 233-270. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.61.09mor

NESPOR, Marina; VOGEL, Irene. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1986.

NI, C. J.; ZHANG, A. Y.; LIU, W. J.; XU, B. Automatic Prosodic Break Detection and Feature Analysis. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, [s.l.], v. 27, n. 6, p. 1184-1196, 2012.

NICKELS, S.; OPITZ, B.; STEINHAUER, K. ERPs Show that Classroom-Instructed Late Second Language Learners Rely on the Same Prosodic Cues in Syntactic Parsing as Native Speakers. Neuroscience Letters, [s.l.], v. 557, p. 107-111, 2013.

OSTENDORF, Mari; PRICE, Patti; SHATTUCK-HUFNAGEL, Stefanie. Boston University Radio Speech Corpus LDC96S36. DVD. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, 1996.

PAUKER, E.; ITZHAK, I.; BAUM, S. R.; STEINHAUER, K. Effects of Cooperating and Conflicting Prosody in Spoken English Garden Path Sentences: ERP Evidence for the Boundary Deletion Hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Cambridge, v. 23, n. 10, p. 2731-2751, 2011. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2011.21610

PIERREHUMBERT, J. B. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. 1980. Dissertation (Doctoral) – Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1980.

PIETRANDREA, P.; KAHANE, S.; LACHERET, A.; SABIO, F. In: RASO, T.; MELLO, H. (Ed.). Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014.

PIKE, K. The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1945.

PRICE, P. J.; OSTENDORF, M.; SHATTUCK-Hufnagel, S.; FONG, C. The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, [s.l.], v. 90, n. 6, p. 2956-2970, 1991.

RASO, T.; CAVALCANTE, F.; MITTMANN, M. M. Prosodic Forms of the Topic Information Unit in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective: a First Survey. In: GSCP INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2016, Napole. Proceedings... Napole. (Forthcoming).

RASO, T.; MELLO, H. (Ed.). C-ORAL-BRASIL I. Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2012.

RASO, T.; MELLO, H. (Ed.). Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014.

RASO, T.; MELLO, H. (Ed.). The C-ORAL-BRASIL II. Corpus de referência do português falado (formal em contexto natural, mídia e telefone). (Em preparação).

RASO, T.; MITTMANN, M. As principais medidas da fala. In: RASO, T.; MELLO, H. (Ed.). C-ORAL-BRASIL I. Corpus de referência do português brasileiro falado informal. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2012. p. 177-220.

RASO, T.; VIEIRA, M. A Description of Dialogic Units/Discourse Markers in Spontaneous Speech Corpora Based on Phonetic Parameters. CHIMERA. Romance Corpora and Linguistic Studies, Madrid, v. 3, p. 221-249, 2016.

REDI, L.; SHATTUCK-HUFNAGEL, S. Variation in the Realization of Glottalization in Normal Speakers. Journal of Phonetics, [s.l.], v. 29, p. 407-29, 2001.

RIETVELD, A.; GUSSENHOVEN, C. On the Relation Between Pitch Excursion Size and Prominence. Journal of Phonetics, [s.l.], v. 13, p. 299-308, 1985.

ROBIN, D. A. et al. Auditory Perception of Temporal and Spectral Events in Patients with Focal Left and Right Cerebral Lesions. Brain and Language, [s.l.], v. 39, p. 539-555, 1990.

ROCHA, B.; RASO, T. O pronome lembrete e a Teoria da Língua em Ato: uma análise baseada em corpora. Veredas, Juiz de Fora, v. 17, n. 2, p. 39-59, 2013.

SCHEGLOFF, E. A. Reflections on Studying Prosody in Talk-in-Interaction. Language and Speech, [s.l.], v. 41, n. 3-4, p. 235-263, 1998.

SCHUURMAN, I.; SCHOUPPE, M.; HOEKSTRA, H.; Van der WOUDEN, T. CGN, an Annotated Corpus of Spoken Dutch. In: INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON LINGUISTICALLY INTERPRETED CORPORA (LINC-03), 4TH, 2003, Budapest. Proceedings… Budapest: EACL, 2003.

SELKIRK, E. Sentence prosody: Intonation, Stress and Phrasing. In: GOLDSMITH, J. A. (Ed.). The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995. p. 550-569.

SHAH, A, P.; BAUM, S. R.; DWIVEDI, V. D. Neural Substrates of Linguistic Prosody: Evidence from Syntactic Disambiguation in the Productions of Brain-Damaged Patients. Brain and Language, [s.l.], v. 96, p. 78-89, 2006.

SHRIBERG, E.; STOLCKE, A.; HAKKANI-TÜR, D.; TÜR, G. Prosody-Based Automatic Segmentation of Speech into Sentences and Topics. Speech Communication, [s.l.], v. 32, n. 1-2, p. 127-154, 2000.

SIGNORINI, S. Topic e soggetto in corpora di italiano parlato spontaneo. 2004. Dissertation (Ph.D.) – Università Firenze, Firenze, 2004.

STEINHAUER, K.; ALTER, K.; FRIEDERICI, A. D. Brain Potentials Indicate Immediate Use of Prosodic Cues in Natural Speech Processing. Nature Neuroscience, [s.l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 191-196, 1999.

STEINHAUER, K. Electrophysiological Correlates of Prosody and Punctuation. Brain and Language, [s.l.], v. 86, n. 1, Special issue on the Neuronal Basis of Language, p. 142-164, 2003.

STEINHAUER, K.; FRIEDERICI, A. D. Prosodic Boundaries, Comma Rules, and Brain Responses: The Closure Positive Shift in ERPs as a Universal Marker for Prosodic Phrasing in Listeners and Readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, [s.l.], v. 30, n. 3, p. 267-295, 2001.

SWERTS, M. Prosodic Features of Discourse Units. 1994. Thesis (PhD) – Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 1994.

SWERTS, M. Prosodic Features at Discourse Boundaries of Different Strength. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, [s.l.], v. 101, n. 1, p. 514-521, 1997.

SWERTS, M.; COLLIER, R.; TERKEN, J. Prosodic Predictors of Discourse Finality in Spontaneous Monologues. Speech Communication, [s.l.], v. 15, n. 1-2, p. 79-90, 1994.

TEIXEIRA FALCÃO, B. H. Correlatos fonético-acústicos de fronteiras prosódicas na fala espontânea, 2017. Tese (Doutorado) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2017.

TESNIÈRE, L. Élements de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: C. Klincksieck, 1965.

THORNTON, R. Children’s Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge. In: ARONOFF, M. (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics, 2016. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.72

TSENG, C. Y.; CHANG, C. H. Pause or No Pause? Prosodic Phrase Boundaries Revisited. Tsinghua Science and Technology, [s.l.], v. 13, n. 4, p. 500-509, 2008.

TSENG, C. Y.; FU, B. Duration, Intensity and Pause Predictions in Relation to Prosody Organization. In: EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON SPEECH COMMUNICATION AND TECHNOLOGY, INTERSPEECH, 9th, 2005. Lisboa. Proceedings… Lisboa: SISCA, 2005. p. 1405-1408. Available at: http://www.ling.sinica.edu.tw/eip/FILES/publish/2007.4.12.99500673.0143164.pdf. Retrieved on: Dec. 1, 2016.

TYLER, J. Prosodic Correlates of Discourse Boundaries and Hierarchy in Discourse Production. Lingua, [s.l.], v. 133, p. 101-126, 2013.

Van DONZEL, M. E. Prosodic Aspects of Information Structure in Discourse. Den Haag: Holland Academic Graphics/IFOTT, 1999.

WAGNER, A. Acoustic Cues for Automatic Determination of Phrasing. In: SPEECH PROSODY 2010 – INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 5th., 2010, Chicago. Proceedings… Chicago: ISCA, 2010. Available at: https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2010/papers/sp10_196.pdf. Retrieved on: Sept. 2018.

WAGNER, M.; WATSON, D. G. Experimental and Theoretical Advances in Prosody: A Review. Language and Cognitive Processes, [s.l.], v. 25, n. 7-9, p. 905-945, 2010.

WIGHTMAN, C. W.; SHATTUCK-HUFNAGEL, S.; OSTENDORF, M.; PRICE, P. J. Segmental Durations in the Vicinity of Prosodic Phrase Boundaries. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America [s.l.], v. 91, n. 3, p. 1707-1717, 1992.

XU, Y. In Defense of Lab Speech. Journal of Phonetics, [s.l.], v. 38, n. 3, p. 329-336, 2010.

YANG, Y.; WANG, B. Acoustic Correlates of Hierarchical Prosodic Boundary in Mandarin. In: SPEECH PROSODY, 2002, Aix-en-Provence. Proceedings… Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage, 2002.

YOON, T-J.; CHAVARRÍA, S.; COLE, J.; HASEGAWA-JOHNSON, M. Intertranscriber Reliability of Prosodic Labeling on Telephone Conversation Using ToBI. In: SPEECH PROSODY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2004. Nara, Japan. Proceedings… Nara: ISCA, 2004. p. 2722-2732.

ZATORRE, R. J. Cerebral Correlates of Human Auditory Processing: Perception of Speech and Musical Sounds. In: SYKA, J. (Ed.). Acoustical Signal Processing in the Central Auditory System. Prague: Plenum Press, 1997. p. 453-468.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.26.4.1397-1433