Modelos de procesamiento sintáctico y sus implicaciones  para el estudio del lenguaje / Syntactic processing models and their implications for the study of language

Noelia Ayelén Stetie

doi:10.17851/2237-2083.29.3.2117-1262

Modelos de procesamiento sintáctico y sus implicaciones para el estudio del lenguaje / Syntactic processing models and their implications for the study of language

Noelia Ayelén Stetie

Abstract

Resumen: Comprender cómo se procesa el lenguaje ha sido interés central de la psicolingüística hace varias décadas ya que entender los procesos involucrados aporta al estudio del lenguaje, pero, también, al estudio y comprensión de la mente. En este artículo se presenta una revisión de los modelos de procesamiento sintáctico y sus aportes a la comprensión acerca del funcionamiento del lenguaje y de la cognición. En primer lugar, se retoman algunas de las discusiones clásicas acerca del procesamiento del lenguaje y los procesos cognitivos en general. En segunda instancia, se realiza una revisión de distintos modelos de procesamiento sintáctico propuestos en las últimas décadas, sus características y supuestos acerca de la facultad del lenguaje. Por último, se comparan las diferentes propuestas en función de los debates clásicos presentados y su posición acerca de la universalidad de ciertos procesos cognitivos.

Palabras-clave: procesos cognitivos; comprensión del lenguaje; procesamiento sintáctico; adjunción.

Abstract: Understanding how language is processed has been a theme of an utmost interest for psycholinguistics for several decades, since fully acknowledging the processes involved contributes not only to the study of language, but also to both the study and understanding of the mind. This article presents a review of syntactic parsing models and their contributions to the comprehension of the functioning of language and cognition. First of all, some of the classical discussions about language processing and cognitive processes in general are analyzed. Secondly, different models of syntactic parsing proposed in the last decades as well as their characteristics and assumptions about the language faculty are reviewed. Finally, the different proposals are compared in terms of the classical debates presented and their position on the universality of certain cognitive processes.

Keywords: cognitive processes; language comprehension; syntactic parsing; attachment.

Keywords

procesos cognitivos; comprensión del lenguaje; procesamiento sintáctico; adjunción; cognitive processes; language comprehension; syntactic parsing; attachment.

Full Text:

PDF (Español (España))

References

ABDELGHANY, H.; FODOR, J. D. Low Attachment of Relative Clauses in Arabic. In: ARCHITECTURES AND MECHANISMS OF LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 5., 1999, Edinburgh, UK. Trabajo presentado. Edinburgh, UK: Cambridge University, 1999.

ACHESON, D. J.; MACDONALD, M. C. The Rhymes that the Reader Perused Confused the Meaning: Phonological Effects During On-line Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, Cambridge, v. 65, n. 2, p. 193-207, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.006

BADDELEY, A. Working Memory, Thought, and Action. Oxford: OuP, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001

BARTON, S. B.; SANFORD, A. J. A Case Study of Anomaly Detection: Shallow Semantic Processing and Cohesion Establishment. Memory & Cognition, New York, v. 21, n. 4, p. 477-487, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197179

BERMOND, B.; VAN HEERDEN, J. The Muller-Lyer Illusion Explained and Its Theoretical Importance Reconsidered. Biology and Philosophy, Amsterdam, v. 11, n. 3, p. 321-338, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128785

BOLAND, J. E.; CUTLER, A. Interaction with Autonomy: Multiple Output Models and the Inadequacy of the Great Divide. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 58, n. 3, p. 309-320, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00684-2

BRYSBAERT, M.; MITCHELL, D. C. Modifier Attachment in Dutch: Deciding between Garden-Path, Construal and Statistical Tuning Accounts of Parsing. In: WORKSHOP ON COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF HUMAN SYNTACTIC PROCESSING, 1996, Wassenaar. Trabajo presentado. Wassenaar: Netherlands Institute for Advanced Studies, 1996.

CAPLAN, D.; DEDE, G.; WATERS, G.; MICHAUD, J.; TRIPODIS, Y. Effects of Age, Speed of Processing, and Working Memory on Comprehension of Sentences with Relative Clauses. Psychology and Aging, Cambridge, v. 26, n. 2, p. 439-450, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021837

CAPLAN, D.; WATERS, G. Issues Regarding General and Domain-Specific Resources. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Cambridge, v. 22, n. 1, p. 114-122, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99441780

CARREIRAS, M.; CLIFTON, C. Relative Clause Interpretation Preferences in Spanish and English. Language and Speech, New York, v. 36, n. 4, p. 353-372, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099303600401

CARREIRAS, M.; MESEGUER, E. Procesamiento de oraciones ambiguas. In: VEGA RODRÍGUEZ, M. D.; CUETOS VEGA, F. (ed.). Psicolingüística del español. Madrid: Trotta, 1999. p. 163-203.

CHOMSKY, N. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton, 1957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009

CHOMSKY, N. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1986.

CHOMSKY, N. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995.

CHOMSKY, N. The Minimalist Program: 20th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015.

CHRISTIANSON, K.; WILLIAMS, C. C.; ZACKS, R. T.; FERREIRA, F. Younger and Older Adults “Good-Enough” Interpretations of Garden-Path Sentences. Discourse Processes, Londres, v. 42, n. 2, p. 205-238, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4202_6

COLMAN, A. M. A Dictionary of Psychology. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

CUETOS, F.; MITCHELL, D. C. Cross-Linguistic Differences in Parsing: Restrictions on the Use of the Late Closure Strategy in Spanish. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 30, n. 1, p. 73-105, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90004-2

CUETOS, F.; MITCHELL, D. C.; CORLEY, M. M. Parsing in Different Languages. In: CARREIRAS, M.; SEBASTIÁN-GALLÉS, N.; GARCÍA-ALBEA, J. (ed.). Language Processing in Spanish. New York: Psychology Press, 1996. p. 145-187.

DE VINCENZI, M.; JOB, R. Some Observations on the Universality of the Late-Closure Strategy. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, New York, v. 22, n. 2, p. 189-206, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067830

DESMET, T.; BRYSBAERT, M.; BAECKE, C. D. The Correspondence Between Sentence Production and Corpus Frequencies in Modifier Attachment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, New York, v. 55, n. 3, p. 879-896, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980143000604

DING, N.; MELLONI, L.; TIAN, X.; POEPPEL, D. Rule-Based and Word-Level Statistics-Based Processing of Language: Insights from Neuroscience. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, New York, v. 32, n. 5, p. 570-575, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1215477

DUSSIAS, P. E. Sentence Parsing in Fluent Spanish-English Bilinguals. In: NICOL, J. (ed.). One Mind, Two Languages: Bilingual Language Processing. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2001. p. 159-176.

EHRLICH, K.; FERNÁNDEZ, E. M.; FODOR, J. D.; STENSHOEL, E.; VINEREANU, M. Low Attachment of Relative Clauses New Data from Swedish. In: ANNUAL CUNY CONFERENCE ON HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING, 12., 1999, New York. Trabajo presentado. New York, NY: CUNY Graduate Center, 1999.

EVERETT, C. Linguistic Relativity: Evidence Across Languages and Cognitive Domains. Berlín: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110308143

EZQUERRO, J. Teorías de la arquitectura de lo mental. In: BRONCANO, F. (ed.). La mente humana. Madrid: Trotta, 1995. p. 97-150.

FEDOROVA, O.; YANOVICH, I. Relative Clause Attachment in Russian: The Role of Constituent Length. In: ARCHITECTURES AND MECHANISMS OF LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 10., 2004, Aix de Provence. Trabajo presentado. Aix de Provence: 2004.

FERNÁNDEZ, E. M. Relative Clause Attachment in Bilinguals and Monolinguals. In: HEREDIA, R.; ALTARRIBA, J. (ed.). Advances in Psychology: Bilingual Sentence Processing. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2002. p. 187-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(02)80011-5

FERNÁNDEZ, E. M. Bilingual Sentence Processing: Relative Clause Attachment in English and Spanish. New York: John Benjamins Publishing, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.29

FERREIRA, F. The Misinterpretation of Noncanonical Sentences. Cognitive Psychology, Cambridge, v. 47, n. 2, p. 164-203, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7

FERREIRA, F.; BAILEY, K. G.; FERRARO, V. Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, New York, v. 11, n. 1, p. 11-15, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00158

FERREIRA, F.; CHRISTIANSON, K.; HOLLINGWORTH, A. Misinterpretations of Garden-Path Sentences: Implications for Models of Sentence Processing and Reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, New York, v. 30, n.1, p. 3-20, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005290706460

FERREIRA, F.; PATSON, N. D. The ‘Good Enough’ Approach to Language Comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, Londres, v. 1, n. 1/2, p. 71-83, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00007.x

FODOR, J. A. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001

FODOR, J. D. Prosodic Disambiguation in Silent Reading. North East Linguistics Society, New York, v. 32, p. 113-132, 2002.

FODOR, J. D.; FERREIRA, F. (ed.). Reanalysis in Sentence Processing. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

FODOR, J. D.; INOUE, A. Attach Anyway. In: FODOR, J.; FERREIRA, F. (ed.). Reanalysis in Sentence Processing. Dordrecht: Springer, 1998. p. 101-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9070-9_4

FRAGA, I.; GARCIA-ORZA, J.; ACUÑA, J. C. Relative Clause Disambiguation in Galician: New Evidence of High Attachment in Romance Languages. Psicológica, Valencia, v. 26, n. 2, p. 243-260, 2005.

FRANK, S. L.; CHRISTIANSEN, M. H. Hierarchical and Sequential Processing of Language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, New York, v. 33, n. 9, p. 1213-1218, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1424347

FRAZIER, L.; CLIFTON, C. Construal. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996.

FRAZIER, L.; CLIFTON, C. Construal: Overview, Motivation, and Some New Evidence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, New York, v. 26, n. 3, p. 277-295, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025024524133

FRAZIER, L.; FODOR, J. D. The Sausage Machine: A New Two-Stage Parsing Model. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 6, p. 291-325, 1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1

FRAZIER, L.; RAYNER, K. Making and Correcting Errors During Sentence Comprehension: Eye Movements in the Analysis of Structurally Ambiguous Sentences. Cognitive Psychology, Cambridge, v. 14, p. 178-210, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1

FRENCK-MESTRE, C.; PYNTE, J. Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution While Reading in Second and Native Languages. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, New York, v. 50, n. 1, p. 119-148, 1997.

FRIEDERICI, A. D. The Brain Basis of Language Processing: From Structure to Function. Physiological Reviews, New York, v. 91, n. 4, p. 1357-1392, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00006.2011

GENNARI, S. P.; MACDONALD, M. C. Linking Production and Comprehension Processes: The Case of Relative Clauses. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 111, n. 1, p. 1-23, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.006

GIBSON, E. The Dependency Locality Theory: A Distance-Based Theory of Linguistic Complexity. In: MARANTZ, A.; MIYASHITA, Y.; O’NEIL, W. (ed.). Image, Language, Brain. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000. p. 95-126.

GIBSON, E.; PEARLMUTTER, N. Constraints on Sentence Comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, Amsterdam, v. 2, n. 7, p. 262-268, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01187-5

GIBSON, E.; PEARLMUTTER, N.; CANSECO-GONZALEZ, E.; HICKOK, G. Recency Preference in the Human Sentence Processing Mechanism. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 59, n. 1, p. 23-59, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00687-7

GIBSON, E.; SCHÜTZE, C. T. Disambiguation Preferences in Noun Phrase Conjunction do not Mirror Corpus Frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, Cambridge, v. 40, n. 2, p. 263-279, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2612

GIGERENZER, G.; TODD, P. M.; THE ABC GROUP. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.

GILBOY, E.; SOPENA, J. M.; CLIFTON, C.; FRAZIER, L. Argument Structure and Preferences in the Processing of Spanish and English Complex NPs. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 54, p. 131-167, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00636-Y

GRICE, H. P. Logic and Conversation. In: COLE, P, MORGAN, J. L. (ed.). Sintax and Semantics. Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 1975. p. 41-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003

GRILLO, N.; COSTA, J. A Novel Argument for the Universality of Parsing Principles. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 133, n. 1, p. 156-187, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.019

GUTIERREZ-ZIARDEGI, E.; CARREIRAS, M.; LAKA, I. Bilingual Sentence Processing: Relative Clause Attachment in Basque and Spanish. In: ANNUAL CUNY CONFERENCE ON HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING, 17, 2004, Maryland. Trabajo presentado. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, 2004.

HAGOORT, P.; BAGGIO, G.; WILLEMS, R. M. Semantic Unification. In: GAZZANIGA, M. (ed.). The Cognitive Neurosciences. 4th ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2009. p. 819-836.

HEMFORTH, B.; KONIECZNY, L.; SCHEEPERS, C. Syntactic Attachment and Anaphor Resolution: The Two Sides of Relative Clause Attachment. In: CROCKER, M.W.; PICKERING, M.; CLIFTON, C. JR. (ed.). Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. p. 259-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527210.012

HENRICH, J.; HEINE, S. J.; NORENZAYAN, A. Most People Are Not WEIRD. Nature, Londres, v. 466, n. 7302, p. 29, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a

HSIAO, Y.; MACDONALD, M. C. Production Predicts Comprehension: Animacy Effects in Mandarin Relative Clause Processing. Journal of Memory and Language, Cambridge, v. 89, p. 87-109, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.11.006

HUETTIG, F. Four Central Questions about Prediction in Language Processing. Brain Research, Amsterdam, v. 1626, p. 118-135, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014

IGOA, J. M.; CARREIRAS, M.; MESEGUER, E. A Study on Late Closure in Spanish: Principle-Grounded vs. Frequency-Based Accounts of Attachment Preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, Londres, v. 51, n. 3, p. 561-592, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713755775

JACKENDOFF, R. Précis of Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Cambridge, v. 26, n. 6, p. 651-707, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X03000153

JACKENDOFF, R. The Parallel Architecture and Its Place in Cognitive Science. In: HEINE, B.; NARROG, H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. p. 646-778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0023

JACKENDOFF, R. Fundamentos del lenguaje: mente, significado, gramática y evolución. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2010.

JAMES, A. N.; FRAUNDORF, S. H.; LEE, E. K.; WATSON, D. G. Individual Differences in Syntactic Processing: Is there Evidence for Reader-Text Interactions? Journal of Memory and Language, Cambridge, v. 102, p. 155-181, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.006

JUN, S. A.; KOIKE, C. Default Prosody and Relative Clause Attachment in Japanese. Japanese-Korean Linguistics, Stanford, v. 13, p. 41-53, 2008.

KAMIDE, Y.; D. C. MITCHELL. Relative Clause Attachment: Non-Determinism in Japanese Parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, New York, v. 26, p. 247-254, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025017817290

KARIMI, H.; FERREIRA, F. Good-Enough Linguistic Representations and Online Cognitive Equilibrium in Language Processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Londres, v. 69, n. 5, p. 1013-1040, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1053951

KIMBALL, J. Seven Principles of Surface Structure Parsing in Natural Language. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 2, p. 15-47, 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(72)90028-5

KLIN, C. M.; GUZMÁN, A. E.; WEINGARTNER, K. M.; RALANO, A. S. When Anaphor Resolution Fails: Partial Encoding of Anaphoric Inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, Cambridge, v. 54, n. 1, p. 131-143, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.09.001

KUPERBERG, G. R. Neural Mechanisms of Language Comprehension: Challenges to Syntax. Brain Research, Amsterdam, v. 1146, p. 23-49, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063

KUPERBERG, G. R.; JAEGER, T. F. What do We Mean by Prediction in Language Comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, New York, v. 31, n. 1, p. 32-59, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299

LEVY, R. Expectation-Based Syntactic Comprehension. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 106, n. 3, p. 1126-1177, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006

LOVRIĆ, N.; FODOR, J. D. Relative Clause Attachment in Sentence Parsing. In: ANNUAL CUNY CONFERENCE ON HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING, 13, 2000, La Jolla. Trabajo presentado. San Diego, CA, 2000.

MACDONALD, J.; MCGURK, H. Visual Influences on Speech Perception Processes. Perception & Psychophysics, New York, v. 24, n. 3, p. 253-257, 1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206096

MACDONALD, M. C.; CHRISTIANSEN, M. H. Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, New York, v. 109, n. 1, p. 35-54, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.35

MACDONALD, M. C.; PEARLMUTTTER, N. J.; SEIDENBERG, M. S. Lexical Nature of Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. Psychological Review, New York, v. 101, n. 4, p. 676-703, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676

MACDONALD, M. C.; SEIDENBERG, M. S. Constraint Satisfaction Accounts of Lexical and Sentence Comprehension. In: TRAXLER, M. J.; GERNSBACHER, M.A. (ed.). Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press, 2006. p. 581-611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50016-X

MACDONALD, M. C.; THORNTON, R. When Language Comprehension Reflects Production Constraints: Resolving Ambiguities with the Help of Past Experience. Memory & Cognition, New York, v. 37, n. 8, p. 1177-1186, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.8.1177

MAIA, M.; MAIA, J. A compreensão de orações relativas por falantes monolíngües e bilíngües de Português e de Inglês. In: MAIA, M.; FINGER, I. (org.). Processamento da Linguagem. Pelotas: Educat, 2005. p. 163-178.

MCCLELLAND, J. L. On The Time Relations of Mental Processes: An Examination of Systems of Processes in Cascade. Psychological Review, New York, v. 86, n. 4, p. 287-330, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.86.4.287

MCGURK, H.; MACDONALD, J. Hearing Lips and Seeing Voices. Nature, Londres, v. 264, n. 5588, p. 746-748, 1976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/264746a0

MCRAE, K.; MATSUKI, K. Constraint-Based Models of Sentence Processing. In: VAN GOMPEL, R. (ed.). Sentence Processing. Sussex: Psychology Press, 2013. p. 51-77.

MCRAE, K.; SPIVEY-KNOWLTON, M. J.; TANENHAUS, M. K. Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-Line Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, Cambridge, v. 38, n. 3, p. 283-312, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2543

MILLER, G. A. The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information. Psychological Review, New York, v. 63, n. 2, p. 81-97, 1956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158

MITCHELL, D. C.; BRYSBAERT, M. Challenges to Recent Theories of Crosslinguistic Variation in Parsing: Evidence from Dutch. In: HILLERT, D. (ed.). Sentence Processing: A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Leiden: Brill, 1998. p. 313-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585492230_018

MITCHELL, D. C.; BRYSBAERT, M.; GRONDELAERS, S.; SWANEPOEL, P. Modifier Attachment in Dutch: Testing Aspects of Construal Theory. In: KENNEDY, A.; RADACH, R.; HELLER, D.; PYNTE, R. (ed.). Reading as a Perceptual Process. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2000. p. 493-516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043642-5/50023-1

MITCHELL, D. C.; CUETOS, F. The Origins of Parsing Strategies. Current Issues in Natural Language Processing, [S.l.], p. 1-12, 1991. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239666294_The_origins_of_parsing_strategies. Accesado en: 10 jan. 2021.

MITCHELL, D. C.; CUETOS, F.; CORLEY, M. M.; BRYSBAERT, M. Exposure-Based Models of Human Parsing: Evidence for the Use of Coarse-Grained (Nonlexical) Statistical Records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, New York, v. 24, n. 6, p. 469-488, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143162

MIYAMOTO, E.T. Relative Clause Processing in Brazilian Portuguese and Japanese. 1999. 125f. Thesis (Doctor of Philosophy) – Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1999.

NIJHAWAN, R. Three-Dimensional Müller-Lyer Illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, New York, v. 49, n. 4, p. 333-341, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205989

NOVICK, J. M.; TRUESWELL, J. C.; THOMPSON-SCHILL, S. L. Broca’s Area and Language Processing: Evidence for the Cognitive Control Connection. Language and Linguistics Compass, Londres, v. 4, n. 10, p. 906-924, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00244.x

NOWAK, A. On Relative Clause Attachment in Polish: Evidence for Late Closure and Against Case Matching. In: ANNUAL CUNY CONFERENCE ON HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING, 13, 2000, La Jolla. Trabajo presentado. San Diego, CA, 2000.

PAPADOPOULOU, D.; CLAHSEN, H. Parsing Strategies in L1 and L2 Sentence Processing: A Study of Relative Clause Attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge, UK, v. 25, n. 4, p. 501-528, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000214

PAYNE, B. R.; GRISON, S.; GAO, X.; CHRISTIANSON, K.; MORROW, D. G.; STINE-MORROW, E. A. Aging and Individual Differences in Binding During Sentence Understanding: Evidence from Temporary and Global Syntactic Attachment Ambiguities. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 130, n. 2, p. 157-173, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.10.005

PIAGET, J. The Equilibrium of Cognitive Structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.

PINKER, S. El instinto del lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza, 1995.

QUINN, D.; ABDELGHANY, H.; FODOR, J. D. More Evidence of Implicit Prosody in Reading: French and Arabic Relative Clauses. In: ANNUAL CUNY CONFERENCE ON HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING, 13, 2000, La Jolla. Trabajo presentado. San Diego, CA, 2000.

REDDING, G. M.; HAWLEY, E. Length Illusion in Fractional Müller-Lyer Stimuli: An Object-Perception Approach. Perception, New York, v. 22, n. 7, p. 819-828, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/p220819

RIBEIRO, A. J. Late Closure em Parsing no Português do Brasil. In: MAIA, M.; FINGER, I. (org). Processamento da linguagem. Pelotas: Educat, 2005. p. 51-70.

ROHDE, H.; LEVY, R.; KEHLER, A. Anticipating Explanations in Relative Clause Processing. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 118, n. 3, p. 339-358, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.016

ROTHMAN, J. On the Typological Economy of Syntactic Transfer: Word Order and Relative Clause High/Low Attachment Preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, Berlin, v. 48, n.2-3, p. 245-273, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2010.011

SALTHOUSE, T. A. The Processing-Speed Theory of Adult Age Differences in Cognition. Psychological Review, New York, v. 103, n. 3, p. 403-428, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403

SANFORD, A. J.; STURT, P. Depth of Processing in Language Comprehension: Not Noticing the Evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Amsterdam, v. 6, n. 9, p. 382-386, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01958-7

SCHWERING, S. C.; MACDONALD, M. C. Verbal Working Memory as Emergent from Language Comprehension and Production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Lausanne, v. 14, p. 1-19, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00068

SEGALL, M. H.; CAMPBELL, D. T.; HERSKOVITS, M. J. Cultural Differences in the Perception of Geometric Illusions. Science, Washington, v. 139, n. 3556, p. 769-771, 1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.139.3556.769

SEKERINA, I. A.; FERNÁNDEZ, E. M.; PETROVA, K. A. Relative Clause Attachment in Bulgarian. In: ANNUAL WORKSHOP ON FORMAL APPROACHES TO SLAVIC LINGUISTICS, 12th, 2004, Ottawa. Proceedings […]. Ottawa: University of Ottawa, 2004. p. 375-394.

SLATTERY, T. J.; STURT, P.; CHRISTIANSON, K.; YOSHIDA, M.; FERREIRA, F. Lingering Misinterpretations of Garden Path Sentences Arise from Competing Syntactic Representations. Journal of Memory and Language, Cambridge, v. 69, n. 2, p. 104-120, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.001

STALLINGS, L. M.; MACDONALD, M. C.; O’SEAGHDHA, P. G. Phrasal Ordering Constraints in Sentence Production: Phrase Length and Verb Disposition in Heavy-NP Shift. Journal of Memory and Language, Cambridge, v. 39, n. 3, p. 392-417, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2586

STEWART, A. J.; HOLLER, J.; KIDD, E. Shallow Processing of Ambiguous Pronouns: Evidence for Delay. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, New York, v. 60, n. 12, p. 1680-1696, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210601160807

SWETS, B.; DESMET, T.; CLIFTON, C.; FERREIRA, F. Underspecification of Syntactic Ambiguities: Evidence from Self-Paced Reading. Memory & Cognition, New York, v. 36, n. 1, p. 201-216, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.1.201

SWETS, B.; DESMET, T.; HAMBRICK, D. Z.; FERREIRA, F. The Role of Working Memory in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution: A Psychometric Approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, New York, v. 136, n. 1, p. 64-81, 2007. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.64

TANENHAUS, M. K.; SPIVEY-KNOWLTON, M. J.; EBERHARD, K.; SEDIVY, J. C. Integration of Visual and Linguistic Information in Spoken Language Comprehension. Science, Washington, v. 268, p. 1632-1634, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7777863

TIIPPANA, K. What is the McGurk Effect? Frontiers in Psychology, Lausanne, v. 5, n. 725, p. 1-3, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00725

TOWNSEND, D.; BEVER, T. G. Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6184.001.0001

TRAXLER, M.; GERNSBACHER, M. A. (ed.). Handbook of Psycholinguistics. London: Elsevier, 2011.

TRUESWELL, J. C.; TANENHAUS, M. K.; GARNSEY, S. M. Semantic Influences on Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, Cambridge, v. 33, n. 3, p. 285-318, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1014

VAN DYKE, J. A.; JOHNS, C. L.; KUKONA, A. Low Working Memory Capacity is Only Spuriously Related to Poor Reading Comprehension. Cognition, Amsterdam, v. 131, n. 3, p. 373-403, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.01.007

VAN GOMPEL, R. P.; PICKERING, M. J.; TRAXLER, M. J. Unrestricted Race: A New Model of Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. In: KENNEDY, A.; RADACH, R.; HELLER, D.; PYNTE, R. (ed.). Reading as a Perceptual Process. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2000. p. 621-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043642-5/50029-2

VAN HERTEN, M.; CHWILLA, D. J.; KOLK, H. H. When Heuristics Clash with Parsing Routines: ERP Evidence for Conflict Monitoring in Sentence Perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Cambridge, v. 18, n. 7, p. 1181-1197, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1181

VOGEL, E. K.; AWH, E. How to Exploit Diversity for Scientific Gain: Using Individual Differences to Constrain Cognitive Theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, New York, v. 17, n. 2, p. 171-176, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00569.x

WATERS, G. S.; CAPLAN, D. The Reliability and Stability of Verbal Working Memory Measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, Dordrecht, v. 35, n. 4, p. 550-564, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195534

WELLS, J. B.; CHRISTIANSEN, M. H.; RACE, D. S.; ACHESON, D. J.; MACDONALD, M. C. Experience and Sentence Processing: Statistical Learning and Relative Clause Comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, Cambridge, v. 58, n. 2, p. 250-271, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002

ZAGAR, D.; PYNTE, J.; RATIVEAU, S. Evidence for Early Closure Attachment on First Pass Reading Times in French. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, New York, v. 50, n. 2, p. 421-438, 1997.

ZUNINO, G. M. Procesamiento de lenguaje: ¿de qué hablamos cuando hablamos de predicción? Quintú Quimün, Revista de lingüística, General Roca, v. 3, p. 1-38, 2019.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.29.3.2117-1262