Toward an ethically committed linguistics

Kanavillil Rajagopalan

Abstract


The pivotal claim of this paper is that ethical issues are invariablypresent in Linguistics even at those moments when one is discussingwhat are presumably ‘purely theoretical’ problems. The reason whymany linguists have difficulty in recognising this is that they areencumbered by a host of dogmas in relation to how a scientificarea of study is constituted. Among these dogmas is the idea thatthe raw materials of the science of language are the so-called ‘hardfacts’ – entities that are, by definition, devoid of any ultimateinterests. It is further believed that all that Linguistics attempts todo is to describe them, or, following Chomsky’s recommendation,explain the whys and wherefores of things, but always in waysthat are purely internal to the phenomena in question.

References


AFENDRAS, E. A. et al. On “New/Non-Native” Englishes: a Gamelan. Journal of Pragmatics, v. 24, n. 3, p. 295-321, 1995.

ANTILLA, C. An introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. New York: Macmillan, 1972.

BAKHTIN, M. M. VOOSINOV, V. N. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press, 1973.

BLOOMFIELD, L. Why a Linguistic Society. Language, v. 1, n.1, p. 1-5, 1925. [Reprinted in HOCKETT, C. F. A Leonard Bloomfield anthology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 109-112, 1970.]

BLOOMFIELD, L. Secondary and Tertiary Responses to Language. Language, v. 20, p. 45-55, 1944.

BOTHA, R. P. The Generative Garden Game: Challenging Chomsky at Conceptual Combat. University of Stellanbosch, 1987.

CÂMARA JR., J. M. Estrutura da Língua Portuguesa. 2. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1970.

CAMERON, D. Feminism and Linguistic Theory. London: Macmillan, 1985.

CATTELL, N. P. The New English Grammar: a Descriptive Introduction. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1966.

CATTELL, N. P. Language and Nature. Mind, p. 1-61, 1995.

CORDER, S. P. Introducing Applied Linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973.

DERRIDA, J. Signature Event Context. In: Margins of Philosophy. Chicago University Press, 1972. [Reprinted in KAMUF, P. (Ed.). A Derrida Reader: Between the Blinds. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1972/1991. p. 80-111.]

FAIRCLOUGH, N. Language and Power. London: Longman, 1989a.

FAIRCLOUGH, N. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989b.

FRASER, E.; LACEY, N. The Politics of Community: a Feminist Critique of the Liberal-Communitarian Debate. Hempel Hamstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.

GRAY, J. Liberalism. Milton Keynes: Open U.P., 1986.

HYMES, D. Review of Stormy Petrel in Linguistics, by R. Hall Jr., Ithaca, New York: Language Services, 1975. Language, v. 56, n. 3, p. 648-652, 1980.

LABOV, W. Resolving the Neo-Grammarian Controversy. Language, v. 57, n. 2, p. 267-308, 1981.

LABOV, W. Objectivity and Commitment In Linguistic Science: the Case of Black English Trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society, v. 11, p. 165-201, 1982.

LOVE, N. Ideal Linguistics. Language and Communication, v. 8, n. 1, p. 69-84, 1988.

MCCONNEL-GINET, S. Language and Gender. In: NEWMEYER, F. J. (Ed.). Language: The Socio-Cultural Context. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey IV. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., 1988. P. 75-99.

MARX, K., ENGELS, F. The German Ideology. 1845-7. In: MARX, K., ENGELS, F. Selected Writings. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1958.

MUNBY, J. Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., 1978.

NEWMEYER, F. J. Linguistic Theory in America. New York: Academic Press, 1980.

NEWMEYER, F. J. The Politics of Linguistics. Chicago: Chicago U.P., 1986.

OAKESHOTT, M. The Masses in Representative Democracy. In: ______. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1991. P. 363-383.

O’BARR, W. M. The Study of Land Politics. In: O’BARR, W. M., O’BARR J.F. (Ed.). Language and Politics. The Hague: Mouton, 1976.

PUTNAM, H. Replies. In: TOMERLIN, J. E. (Ed.). Philosophical Topics, v. 20, p. 347-408, 1993.

PHILLIPSON, R. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

RAJAGOPALAN, K. Grammar: the Bee in the Linguist’s Bonnet vs. the Thorn in the Language Teacher’s Flesh. Anais do V ENPULI. São Paulo: PUC-SP, 1984. p. 182-192.

RAJAGOPALAN, K. Sobre a indissociabilidade do historiar a lingüística do próprio fazer da lingüística. D.E.L.T.A., v. 5, n. 2, p. 225-240, 1989.

RAJAGOPALAN, K. On the History of Myth and Myth of History. Proceedings of XXIII Seminar of the SENAPULLI. São Paulo, 1991. p. 121-124.

RAJAGOPALAN, K. Chameleon Linguist and the Revival of Casuistry: Afterthoughts on a Controversial Suggestion by Fernando Tarallo. D.E.L.T.A., v. 9, n. Especial, p. 339-352, 1993.

RAJAGOPALAN, K. On Listening for Nietzschean Echoes in J. L. Austin’s Philosophical Discourse. Letras & Letras, v. 10, n. 1 e 2, p. 89-106, 1994.

RAJAGOPALAN, K. Critical Discourse Analysis and its Discontents. Working Papers Series, v. 72. Lancaster: Lancaster University, 1995.

RAJAGOPALAN, K. On the Ideological Underpinnings of the Theory of Speech Acts. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, v. 5, n. 4, p. 105-132, 1996.

RAJAGOPALAN, K. Linguistics and the Myth of Nativity: Comments on the Controversy Over “New/Non-Native Englishe”. Journal of Pragmatics, v. 27, p. 225-231, 1997a.

RAJAGOPALAN, K. Formalismo vs. funcionalismo: sobre as premissas ocultas dessa polêmica. Anais do 1º Encontro do CEL-SUL, 1. 1, 1997b, p. 25-33.

RAJAGOPALAN, K. A ideologia do suprimido: ou como não teorizar a respeito de ideologia. D.E.L.T.A., v. 14, n. 1, p. 121-139, 1998a.

RAJAGOPALAN, K. O conceito de identidade na lingüística: é chegada a hora para uma reconsideração radical? In: SIGNORINI (Ed.). Lingua(gem) e identidade. Campinas: Mercado de Letras, 1998b. p. 21-40.

RAJAGOPALAN, K. On the Theoretical Trappings of the Thesis of Anti-Theory; or, why the Idea of Theory May Not, After All, Be All That Bad: a Response to Gary Thomas. Harvard Educational Review, v. 67, n. 3, p. 335-352, 1998c.

RAJAGOPALAN, K. (Forthcoming). Between Marx and Derrida: an Exercise in Literary Semantics. To appear in the Journal of Literary Semantics.

RAMPTON, B. Politics and Change in Research in Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, v. 16, n. 2, p. 233-256, 1995.

REDDY, M. The Conduit Metaphor – a Case of Frame Conflict in our Language about Language. In: ORTONY, A. (Ed.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., 1979. p. 284-324,

RESTIVO, S. The Social Life of Mathematics. Philosophica, v. 42, p. 5-20, 1988.

ROMAINE, S. Bilingualism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.

SAMPSON, G. Schools of Linguistics: Competition and Evolution. London: Hutchinson, 1980.

SANDERS, G. A. Issues of Explanation in Linguistics. In: COHEN, D. (Ed.). Explaining Linguistic Phenomena. N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons, 1974. p. 1-20.

SCHLIEBEN-LANGE, B. Reflexões a respeito do escrever sobre a história da lingüística. D.E.L.T.A., v. 5, n. 1, p. 1-22, 1989.

SIMPSON, P. Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge, 1993.

TARSKI, A. The Semantic Conception of Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, v. 4, p. 342-375, 1944.

TOOLAN, M. Review of R. Harris: The Language Machine. Language in Society, v. 18, n. 2, p. 269-275, 1989.

WIDDOWSON, H. Explorations in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford U.P., 1972.

WIDDOWSON, H. Discourse Analysis: a Critical View. (Draft version). Paper presented at Lanaster Applied Linguistic Seminar. Unpublished manuscript, 1994.

WIDDOWSON, H. Review of N. Fairclough: Discourse and Social Change. Applied Linguistics, v. 16, n. 4, p. 510-516, 1995.

WILKINS, D. A. Linguistics in Language Teaching. London: Edward Arnold, 1972.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.8.1.211-237

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
';

Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c)



e - ISSN 2237-2083 

License

Licensed through  Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional